The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements.

Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements.
Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements.
We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such as Kelly showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to whether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents. Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier scope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how many entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking experiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations were singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the indirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with the on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified phrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference for singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude that relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading but may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors, unless required by secondary tasks.
1069-9384
953-959
Filik, Ruth.
edd26a21-bccc-4476-a1db-f5600e5a34cb
Paterson, Kevin.B.
d01b2e68-f061-4b22-986e-f903cb5362d6
Liversedge, Simon.P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Filik, Ruth.
edd26a21-bccc-4476-a1db-f5600e5a34cb
Paterson, Kevin.B.
d01b2e68-f061-4b22-986e-f903cb5362d6
Liversedge, Simon.P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee

Filik, Ruth., Paterson, Kevin.B. and Liversedge, Simon.P. (2004) Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 (5), 953-959.

Record type: Article

Abstract

We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such as Kelly showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to whether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents. Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier scope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how many entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking experiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations were singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the indirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with the on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified phrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference for singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude that relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading but may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors, unless required by secondary tasks.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 55537
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55537
ISSN: 1069-9384
PURE UUID: b9dd7402-327f-41ca-9065-b32a2d2e4b3e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2008
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 16:03

Export record

Contributors

Author: Ruth. Filik
Author: Kevin.B. Paterson
Author: Simon.P. Liversedge

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×