Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements.
Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements.
We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such as Kelly showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to whether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents. Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier scope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how many entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking experiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations were singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the indirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with the on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified phrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference for singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude that relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading but may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors, unless required by secondary tasks.
953-959
Filik, Ruth.
edd26a21-bccc-4476-a1db-f5600e5a34cb
Paterson, Kevin.B.
d01b2e68-f061-4b22-986e-f903cb5362d6
Liversedge, Simon.P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
October 2004
Filik, Ruth.
edd26a21-bccc-4476-a1db-f5600e5a34cb
Paterson, Kevin.B.
d01b2e68-f061-4b22-986e-f903cb5362d6
Liversedge, Simon.P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Filik, Ruth., Paterson, Kevin.B. and Liversedge, Simon.P.
(2004)
Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 (5), .
Abstract
We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such as Kelly showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to whether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents. Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier scope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how many entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking experiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations were singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the indirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with the on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified phrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference for singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude that relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading but may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors, unless required by secondary tasks.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 55537
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55537
ISSN: 1069-9384
PURE UUID: b9dd7402-327f-41ca-9065-b32a2d2e4b3e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2008
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 16:03
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Ruth. Filik
Author:
Kevin.B. Paterson
Author:
Simon.P. Liversedge
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics