New insights into the ocean heat budget closure problem from analysis of the SOC air-sea flux climatology
New insights into the ocean heat budget closure problem from analysis of the SOC air-sea flux climatology
 
  Results from an analysis of the Southampton Oceanography Centre (SOC) global air–sea heat flux climatology, which has been calculated using in situ weather reports from voluntary observing ships covering the period 1980–93, are presented. Systematic errors in the fluxes arising from differences in observing procedure have been quantified and corrected; the magnitude of these errors is up to 15 W m?2 with strong seasonal and regional variations. Despite these corrections, closure of the ocean heat budget is not obtained as the global mean net heat flux is an oceanic gain of 30 W m?2. The validity of closing the heat budget by global scaling of the flux components is assessed by comparison of the SOC flux fields with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute research buoy measurements. The level of agreement between the two is found to vary from one site to another. Thus, closure of the ocean heat budget requires regional adjustments to the flux components in order to avoid significant biases in the adjusted fields. Close agreement is found for several buoys deployed in the Subduction Array off the coast of northwest Africa. However, at other buoy deployment sites in the western equatorial Pacific warm pool and south of Bermuda in the North Atlantic, the flux adjustment improves the estimate of the net heat exchange. Further evidence for regional biases is obtained from a comparison of box mean surface heat fluxes derived from hydrographic section data with the corresponding SOC values in the Atlantic and North Pacific. The climatological heat loss is found to be an underestimate in those boxes containing the strongest surface flux expression of the major western boundary currents.
  air-sea interaction, air-sea flux, ocean heat transport, marine meteorology, climatology, dataset
  
  
  2856-2880
  
    
      Josey, Simon A.
      
        2252ab7f-5cd2-49fd-a951-aece44553d93
      
     
  
    
      Kent, Elizabeth C.
      
        ea23f6f0-ccf6-4702-a5c9-184e9c5d4427
      
     
  
    
      Taylor, Peter K.
      
        d29e0494-9f67-4bc8-aee4-aa90a2885067
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      September 1999
    
    
  
  
    
      Josey, Simon A.
      
        2252ab7f-5cd2-49fd-a951-aece44553d93
      
     
  
    
      Kent, Elizabeth C.
      
        ea23f6f0-ccf6-4702-a5c9-184e9c5d4427
      
     
  
    
      Taylor, Peter K.
      
        d29e0494-9f67-4bc8-aee4-aa90a2885067
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Josey, Simon A., Kent, Elizabeth C. and Taylor, Peter K.
  
  
  
  
   
    (1999)
  
  
    
    New insights into the ocean heat budget closure problem from analysis of the SOC air-sea flux climatology.
  
  
  
  
    Journal of Climate, 12 (9), .
  
   (doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2856:NIITOH>2.0.CO;2). 
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
      
        
          Abstract
          Results from an analysis of the Southampton Oceanography Centre (SOC) global air–sea heat flux climatology, which has been calculated using in situ weather reports from voluntary observing ships covering the period 1980–93, are presented. Systematic errors in the fluxes arising from differences in observing procedure have been quantified and corrected; the magnitude of these errors is up to 15 W m?2 with strong seasonal and regional variations. Despite these corrections, closure of the ocean heat budget is not obtained as the global mean net heat flux is an oceanic gain of 30 W m?2. The validity of closing the heat budget by global scaling of the flux components is assessed by comparison of the SOC flux fields with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute research buoy measurements. The level of agreement between the two is found to vary from one site to another. Thus, closure of the ocean heat budget requires regional adjustments to the flux components in order to avoid significant biases in the adjusted fields. Close agreement is found for several buoys deployed in the Subduction Array off the coast of northwest Africa. However, at other buoy deployment sites in the western equatorial Pacific warm pool and south of Bermuda in the North Atlantic, the flux adjustment improves the estimate of the net heat exchange. Further evidence for regional biases is obtained from a comparison of box mean surface heat fluxes derived from hydrographic section data with the corresponding SOC values in the Atlantic and North Pacific. The climatological heat loss is found to be an underestimate in those boxes containing the strongest surface flux expression of the major western boundary currents.
        
        This record has no associated files available for download.
       
    
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: September 1999
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
    
  
    
     
        Keywords:
        air-sea interaction, air-sea flux, ocean heat transport, marine meteorology, climatology, dataset
      
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 55571
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55571
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 0894-8755
        
        
          PURE UUID: f84c9a67-3671-497d-b732-86f44be279d7
        
  
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 04 Aug 2008
  Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:56
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                Simon A. Josey
              
              
            
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Elizabeth C. Kent
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Peter K. Taylor
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics