Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees
Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees
Contemporary acceleration of biodiversity loss makes increasingly urgent the need to understand the controls of species coexistence1, 2. Tree diversity in particular plays a pivotal role in determining terrestrial biodiversity, through maintaining diversity of its dependent species3, 4 and with them, their predators and parasites. Most theories of coexistence based on the principle of limiting similarity suggest that coexistence of competing species is inherently unstable; coexistence of competitors must be maintained by external forces such as disturbance5, 6, immigration7 or 'patchiness' of resources in space and time8, 9. In contrast, storage theory postulates stable coexistence of competing species through temporal alternation of conditions favouring recruitment of one species over the other10, 11. Here we use storage theory to develop explicit predictions for relative differences between competitors that allow us to discriminate between coexistence models. Data on tree species from a primary forest on the Mexican Pacific coast support a general dynamic of storage processes determining coexistence of similar tree species in this community, and allow us to reject all other theories of coexistence.
437-440
Kelly, C.K.
8fde11ef-815e-40db-adde-1c4b2c8d1e35
Bowler, M.G.
7a5b3941-603f-438d-ad82-4a209246d28f
23 May 2002
Kelly, C.K.
8fde11ef-815e-40db-adde-1c4b2c8d1e35
Bowler, M.G.
7a5b3941-603f-438d-ad82-4a209246d28f
Kelly, C.K. and Bowler, M.G.
(2002)
Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees.
Nature, 417, .
(doi:10.1038/417437a).
Abstract
Contemporary acceleration of biodiversity loss makes increasingly urgent the need to understand the controls of species coexistence1, 2. Tree diversity in particular plays a pivotal role in determining terrestrial biodiversity, through maintaining diversity of its dependent species3, 4 and with them, their predators and parasites. Most theories of coexistence based on the principle of limiting similarity suggest that coexistence of competing species is inherently unstable; coexistence of competitors must be maintained by external forces such as disturbance5, 6, immigration7 or 'patchiness' of resources in space and time8, 9. In contrast, storage theory postulates stable coexistence of competing species through temporal alternation of conditions favouring recruitment of one species over the other10, 11. Here we use storage theory to develop explicit predictions for relative differences between competitors that allow us to discriminate between coexistence models. Data on tree species from a primary forest on the Mexican Pacific coast support a general dynamic of storage processes determining coexistence of similar tree species in this community, and allow us to reject all other theories of coexistence.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Submitted date: 18 September 2001
Published date: 23 May 2002
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 55754
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55754
ISSN: 0028-0836
PURE UUID: ece5a902-6acb-4bc3-85c1-b58de8a7b77e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
C.K. Kelly
Author:
M.G. Bowler
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics