The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Functional diversity within a morphologically conservative genus of predators: implications for functional equivalence and redundancy in ecological communities

Resetarits, W.J. and Chalcraft, D.R. (2007) Functional diversity within a morphologically conservative genus of predators: implications for functional equivalence and redundancy in ecological communities Functional Ecology, 21, (4), pp. 793-804. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01282.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

1. The idea that sets of species may have similar effects on population, community or ecosystem processes is a prevalent theme in many areas of ecology, especially in the context of biodiversity and ecosystem function. If indeed species are functionally equivalent, limiting similarity suggests that it should be closely related, morphologically similar species using similar resources in a similar manner.
2. We assayed the functional equivalence of three congeneric, morphologically similar predatory fish species (genus Enneacanthus). Functional equivalence was evaluated using aspects of both effects of fish on a variety of prey responses and the growth responses of the fish themselves as a measure of energy consumption. Fish were matched by initial size to control for effects of body size. A strict definition of functional equivalence based on niche theory was used to delineate it from the alternative of functional diversity.
3. Based on observed effects on larval anurans, only a single species pair could roughly be judged functionally equivalent, but these two species showed the greatest differences in growth rate and, hence, metabolic demand. Using the criterion of relative yield total, again, only a single pair could roughly be judged equivalent, however, members of this alternative species pair were dramatically different in their effects on larval anurans. Thus, as previously shown for a more diverse set of species, grouping of species by similarity in effects depends upon the specific response variable.
4. Overall range of effects produced on a variety of response variables was surprising, given the similarity in morphology and autecology, strong phylogenetic affinity, and the fact that neither predator size nor growth explained significant variation. Each species appears to be interacting with the environment in a different manner, either as a consequence of differences in metabolic demand or differences in preferences or efficiency with regard to prey types.
5. Observed responses are consistent with the predictions of niche theory and support an alternative explanation for observed relationships between diversity and ecosystem function. Our work suggests that functional equivalence may be uncommon, difficult to predict a priori, and that functional diversity, not functional equivalence, may underlie observed diversity–ecosystem function relationships.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 11 July 2007
Keywords: ecosystem function, functional redundancy, niche, species diversity, species turnover

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 56197
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/56197
ISSN: 0269-8463
PURE UUID: 43ee1784-56a5-4ace-8bd8-57ebc97e8a4d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Aug 2008
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 14:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: W.J. Resetarits
Author: D.R. Chalcraft

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×