The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees

The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees
The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees
Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) and honeybees, Apis mellifera, both use odour cues deposited on flowers by previous visitors to improve their foraging efficiency. Short-lived repellent scents are used to avoid probing flowers that have recently been depleted of nectar and/or pollen, and longer-term attractant scents to indicate particularly rewarding flowers. Previous research has indicated that bumblebees avoid flowers recently visited by themselves, conspecifics and congeners, while honeybees avoid flowers visited by themselves or conspecifics only. We found that both bumblebees and honeybees also avoided flowers previously visited by each other when foraging on Melilotus officinalis, that is, bumblebees avoided flowers recently visited by honeybees and vice versa. Twenty-four hours after a visit, this effect had worn off. Honeybees visited flowers that had been visited 24 h previously more often than flowers that had never been visited. The same was not true for bumblebees, suggesting that foraging honeybees were also using long-term attractant scent marks, whilst bumblebees were not. Flowers previously visited by conspecifics were repellent to bumblebees and honeybees for ca. 40 min. During this time, nectar replenished in flowers. Honeybees were previously thought to use a volatile chemical (2-heptanone) as a repellent forage-marking scent. We suggest that they may be using a less volatile chemical odour to detect whether flowers have recently been visited, possibly in addition to 2-heptanone. (C) 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
manandibular glands, chemical signals, flowers, bees, constancy, behaviour, movement, nectar, matter, tests
0003-3472
183-189
Stout, Jane Catherine
6b6fb5d2-6dcf-4091-bf62-ea25534364c8
Goulson, Dave
50da43d9-00ee-46c3-8107-fa8c67f7f4b5
Stout, Jane Catherine
6b6fb5d2-6dcf-4091-bf62-ea25534364c8
Goulson, Dave
50da43d9-00ee-46c3-8107-fa8c67f7f4b5

Stout, Jane Catherine and Goulson, Dave (2001) The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees. Animal Behaviour, 62 (1), 183-189. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1729).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) and honeybees, Apis mellifera, both use odour cues deposited on flowers by previous visitors to improve their foraging efficiency. Short-lived repellent scents are used to avoid probing flowers that have recently been depleted of nectar and/or pollen, and longer-term attractant scents to indicate particularly rewarding flowers. Previous research has indicated that bumblebees avoid flowers recently visited by themselves, conspecifics and congeners, while honeybees avoid flowers visited by themselves or conspecifics only. We found that both bumblebees and honeybees also avoided flowers previously visited by each other when foraging on Melilotus officinalis, that is, bumblebees avoided flowers recently visited by honeybees and vice versa. Twenty-four hours after a visit, this effect had worn off. Honeybees visited flowers that had been visited 24 h previously more often than flowers that had never been visited. The same was not true for bumblebees, suggesting that foraging honeybees were also using long-term attractant scent marks, whilst bumblebees were not. Flowers previously visited by conspecifics were repellent to bumblebees and honeybees for ca. 40 min. During this time, nectar replenished in flowers. Honeybees were previously thought to use a volatile chemical (2-heptanone) as a repellent forage-marking scent. We suggest that they may be using a less volatile chemical odour to detect whether flowers have recently been visited, possibly in addition to 2-heptanone. (C) 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Submitted date: 5 October 2000
Published date: July 2001
Keywords: manandibular glands, chemical signals, flowers, bees, constancy, behaviour, movement, nectar, matter, tests

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 57696
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/57696
ISSN: 0003-3472
PURE UUID: c017b58e-8540-4985-b167-831182c86cad

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jane Catherine Stout
Author: Dave Goulson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×