The robot in the kitchen: The cultural politics of care-work and the development of in-home assistive technology
The robot in the kitchen: The cultural politics of care-work and the development of in-home assistive technology
This paper considers two trends at opposite ends of the new economy: low-paid in-home care work, and the development of high-tech “social” robots. At present, the work of caring for the elderly, disabled, and convalescents is done primarily by women (disproportionately women of color) in the space of the home (Pratt, 1999). Meanwhile, in robotics labs at elite research universities and industry think-tanks in the U.S., Europe, and Japan, prototypes are being developed to take over some of this labor. Considered together, these two phenomena raise a number of questions, including: how might ideas about gender and race shape the development of assistive technologies; what does development in this field mean for understandings about technology’s “place” in our lives; and, potentially, even for those who rely on carework for their livelihood? The space of the home carries great cultural and symbolic significance (England, 2000). Allowing robots into this space to help us with our most private tasks would mark an unprecedented level of intimacy in our relationship with technology. While a “nursebot” may be able to measure vital signs, how would the replacement of a human care-giver with an assistive technology alter the relationship between the person being cared-for and the world outside? Drawing on disciplinary frames of Cultural Geography and Science and Technology Studies, this paper explores the social politics, and possible futures, of in-home assistive technology.
72-79
Boyer, L.K.
8ddf6f92-495b-4f00-8ac9-0c452082e2d7
2004
Boyer, L.K.
8ddf6f92-495b-4f00-8ac9-0c452082e2d7
Boyer, L.K.
(2004)
The robot in the kitchen: The cultural politics of care-work and the development of in-home assistive technology.
The Middle-States Geographer, 37, .
Abstract
This paper considers two trends at opposite ends of the new economy: low-paid in-home care work, and the development of high-tech “social” robots. At present, the work of caring for the elderly, disabled, and convalescents is done primarily by women (disproportionately women of color) in the space of the home (Pratt, 1999). Meanwhile, in robotics labs at elite research universities and industry think-tanks in the U.S., Europe, and Japan, prototypes are being developed to take over some of this labor. Considered together, these two phenomena raise a number of questions, including: how might ideas about gender and race shape the development of assistive technologies; what does development in this field mean for understandings about technology’s “place” in our lives; and, potentially, even for those who rely on carework for their livelihood? The space of the home carries great cultural and symbolic significance (England, 2000). Allowing robots into this space to help us with our most private tasks would mark an unprecedented level of intimacy in our relationship with technology. While a “nursebot” may be able to measure vital signs, how would the replacement of a human care-giver with an assistive technology alter the relationship between the person being cared-for and the world outside? Drawing on disciplinary frames of Cultural Geography and Science and Technology Studies, this paper explores the social politics, and possible futures, of in-home assistive technology.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 57883
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/57883
ISSN: 1067-2230
PURE UUID: 9eb32eeb-f106-4d2f-b68d-f4d79c4f8913
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Aug 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 17:54
Export record
Contributors
Author:
L.K. Boyer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics