Evaluation of professional development strategies for bringing contemporary science into the classroom
Evaluation of professional development strategies for bringing contemporary science into the classroom
Much has been written about frameworks of continuing professional development focusing principally on improving teachers’ pedagogical skills (e.g. Joyce & Showers, 1988; Loucks-Horsley et al, 1998; Darling-Hammond & Youngs, 2002; Adey, 2004). Such research suggests that targeted professional development should be implemented over a long time scale, include in-class coaching and opportunities for teachers’ reflections on any change in classroom practice that they make. Adey (2004) proposes that there are a number of factors which influence the effectiveness of professional development in its ultimate aim – improvement of student learning. Besides the quality of the professional development programme itself, the nature of the innovation to be made, the support of school senior management and collegiality of the group of teachers engaged in the professional development are all important. In many professional development programmes, the innovation is pre-determined in being focused on particularly teaching programmes. In England, regional Science Learning Centres have been set up with government funding to provide professional development which focuses as much on improving teachers’ knowledge of contemporary science and its implications, as on appropriate pedagogical content knowledge which follows. The Centres are charged with CPD provision across a wide target audience - teachers of science to ages 5 to 19 and technicians - and a wide geographical area. Teachers’ needs are thus diverse and the ‘innovation’ is not necessarily linked to the teaching of a common scheme. This paper describes the methods adopted by the Science Learning Centre South East in considering established principles of effective professional development and evaluates the outcomes from the first groups of teachers undertaking professional development through the Centre. The research considers the question: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the format of professional development in promoting the use of contemporary science in the classroom?
science education, professional development
Ratcliffe, Mary
23eb1e68-67a1-4b73-ad0e-925dcb12e5e8
Hanley, Pam
e6294627-36ff-4289-8b0b-0ac9c38d254a
August 2005
Ratcliffe, Mary
23eb1e68-67a1-4b73-ad0e-925dcb12e5e8
Hanley, Pam
e6294627-36ff-4289-8b0b-0ac9c38d254a
Ratcliffe, Mary and Hanley, Pam
(2005)
Evaluation of professional development strategies for bringing contemporary science into the classroom.
European Science Education Research Association Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
01 Aug 2005.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Much has been written about frameworks of continuing professional development focusing principally on improving teachers’ pedagogical skills (e.g. Joyce & Showers, 1988; Loucks-Horsley et al, 1998; Darling-Hammond & Youngs, 2002; Adey, 2004). Such research suggests that targeted professional development should be implemented over a long time scale, include in-class coaching and opportunities for teachers’ reflections on any change in classroom practice that they make. Adey (2004) proposes that there are a number of factors which influence the effectiveness of professional development in its ultimate aim – improvement of student learning. Besides the quality of the professional development programme itself, the nature of the innovation to be made, the support of school senior management and collegiality of the group of teachers engaged in the professional development are all important. In many professional development programmes, the innovation is pre-determined in being focused on particularly teaching programmes. In England, regional Science Learning Centres have been set up with government funding to provide professional development which focuses as much on improving teachers’ knowledge of contemporary science and its implications, as on appropriate pedagogical content knowledge which follows. The Centres are charged with CPD provision across a wide target audience - teachers of science to ages 5 to 19 and technicians - and a wide geographical area. Teachers’ needs are thus diverse and the ‘innovation’ is not necessarily linked to the teaching of a common scheme. This paper describes the methods adopted by the Science Learning Centre South East in considering established principles of effective professional development and evaluates the outcomes from the first groups of teachers undertaking professional development through the Centre. The research considers the question: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the format of professional development in promoting the use of contemporary science in the classroom?
Text
ESERA_paper_final_mr.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: August 2005
Venue - Dates:
European Science Education Research Association Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 2005-08-01 - 2005-08-01
Keywords:
science education, professional development
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 57906
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/57906
PURE UUID: 8c3c4a75-f27e-4a82-bc12-7099a53436c6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:09
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Mary Ratcliffe
Author:
Pam Hanley
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics