Assessing leadership potential: is there a place for emotional intelligence?
Assessing leadership potential: is there a place for emotional intelligence?
For more than half a century organisations have been obsessively concerned with identifying the traits or characteristics associated with effective leadership ( Kets De Vries, 1993; Higgs, 2002; Parry & Miedl, 2002). One frequently employed, and well validated, approach to identifying leadership potential has been the use of assessment/ development centres ( eg. Thornton & Byham, 1982; Goodge, 1995; 1997; Woodruffe, 1993). More recently it has been asserted that a major determinant of leadership effectiveness (and in turn potential) is the concept of Emotional Intelligence (Goleman, 1998; Sparrow, 2002; Higgs & Dulewicz, 1999; Higgs, 2002).
This paper explores the extent to which the claims for the importance of Emotional Intelligence as a predictor of leadership potential are borne out. The paper reports the results of a study of a leadership development centre ( employing established assessment centre technology) in which participants also completed an established measure of Emotional Intelligence - the EIQ Managerial ( Dulewicz & Higgs, 2000, Dulewicz, Higgs & Slaski, 2001).In the study the development centre ratings of overall potential and core criteria were correlated with the overall EI scores and scores on the seven EI scales. The sample studied comprised 40 senior managers working within the New Zealand Public Service (NZPS). The leadership criteria employed in the development centre comprised eight competencies identified as being required for effective leadership performance as a CEO within the NZPS.
The results of the analyses provide some strong evidence to support the relationships between EI and leadership potential asserted from both a theoretical standpoint and from other studies of leadership performance (eg. Higgs & Rowland, 2001). However, surprisingly, the elements of EI classed as intra-personal (Dulewicz, Higgs & Slaski, 2001) show stronger relationships with leadership potential than the interpersonal elements. It is suggested that this may be due to the behavioural indicators used to operationalise the centre criteria rather than the underlying construct relationships. Whilst the limitations of sample size are clearly identified, the results do indicate that further research using both larger and more diverse samples may be warranted.
1861811535
Higgs, M.J.
bd61667f-4b7c-4caf-9d79-aee907c03ae3
Aitken, P
ec4380c2-50fd-4cb7-ad71-576aa2677201
2003
Higgs, M.J.
bd61667f-4b7c-4caf-9d79-aee907c03ae3
Aitken, P
ec4380c2-50fd-4cb7-ad71-576aa2677201
Higgs, M.J. and Aitken, P
(2003)
Assessing leadership potential: is there a place for emotional intelligence?
(Henley Working Paper Series, HWP 0301),
Reading, UK.
University of Reading
Abstract
For more than half a century organisations have been obsessively concerned with identifying the traits or characteristics associated with effective leadership ( Kets De Vries, 1993; Higgs, 2002; Parry & Miedl, 2002). One frequently employed, and well validated, approach to identifying leadership potential has been the use of assessment/ development centres ( eg. Thornton & Byham, 1982; Goodge, 1995; 1997; Woodruffe, 1993). More recently it has been asserted that a major determinant of leadership effectiveness (and in turn potential) is the concept of Emotional Intelligence (Goleman, 1998; Sparrow, 2002; Higgs & Dulewicz, 1999; Higgs, 2002).
This paper explores the extent to which the claims for the importance of Emotional Intelligence as a predictor of leadership potential are borne out. The paper reports the results of a study of a leadership development centre ( employing established assessment centre technology) in which participants also completed an established measure of Emotional Intelligence - the EIQ Managerial ( Dulewicz & Higgs, 2000, Dulewicz, Higgs & Slaski, 2001).In the study the development centre ratings of overall potential and core criteria were correlated with the overall EI scores and scores on the seven EI scales. The sample studied comprised 40 senior managers working within the New Zealand Public Service (NZPS). The leadership criteria employed in the development centre comprised eight competencies identified as being required for effective leadership performance as a CEO within the NZPS.
The results of the analyses provide some strong evidence to support the relationships between EI and leadership potential asserted from both a theoretical standpoint and from other studies of leadership performance (eg. Higgs & Rowland, 2001). However, surprisingly, the elements of EI classed as intra-personal (Dulewicz, Higgs & Slaski, 2001) show stronger relationships with leadership potential than the interpersonal elements. It is suggested that this may be due to the behavioural indicators used to operationalise the centre criteria rather than the underlying construct relationships. Whilst the limitations of sample size are clearly identified, the results do indicate that further research using both larger and more diverse samples may be warranted.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2003
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 58113
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58113
ISBN: 1861811535
PURE UUID: dd449a5b-bfa3-4d34-87f1-ae4533cc4b54
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Aug 2008
Last modified: 22 Oct 2022 01:40
Export record
Contributors
Author:
P Aitken
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics