Rules of engagement: toward an analysis of staff responses to challenging behavior
Rules of engagement: toward an analysis of staff responses to challenging behavior
Through observational analysis, the actions of care staff have frequently been identified as sources of socially mediated reinforcement capable of developing and maintaining challenging behavior. Accordingly, behavioral interventions have often sought to train care staff as behavioral change agents. As yet, however, there have been few attempts to conduct full functional analyses of the behavior of care staff working with people with mental retardation and challenging behaviors. We argue that although direct contingency-shaping of staff behavior has rightly been emphasized, it is possible that many aspects of staff conduct are under the indirect control of verbal formulations. If staff behavior is rule-governed (Skinner, 1969), a range of different sources of control must be considered in a complete analysis. Using this framework, we interpret existing literature on staff behavior and identify research strategies that will extend our understanding of why staff act as they do.
279-298
Hastings, R.P.
7c2e6f17-c5e8-47bc-baff-137dd6ce9f9a
Remington, B.
b95a0759-66ad-44b7-984e-a087547b2706
1994
Hastings, R.P.
7c2e6f17-c5e8-47bc-baff-137dd6ce9f9a
Remington, B.
b95a0759-66ad-44b7-984e-a087547b2706
Hastings, R.P. and Remington, B.
(1994)
Rules of engagement: toward an analysis of staff responses to challenging behavior.
Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15 (4), .
(doi:10.1016/0891-4222(94)90008-6).
Abstract
Through observational analysis, the actions of care staff have frequently been identified as sources of socially mediated reinforcement capable of developing and maintaining challenging behavior. Accordingly, behavioral interventions have often sought to train care staff as behavioral change agents. As yet, however, there have been few attempts to conduct full functional analyses of the behavior of care staff working with people with mental retardation and challenging behaviors. We argue that although direct contingency-shaping of staff behavior has rightly been emphasized, it is possible that many aspects of staff conduct are under the indirect control of verbal formulations. If staff behavior is rule-governed (Skinner, 1969), a range of different sources of control must be considered in a complete analysis. Using this framework, we interpret existing literature on staff behavior and identify research strategies that will extend our understanding of why staff act as they do.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1994
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 58160
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58160
ISSN: 0891-4222
PURE UUID: 555b3d89-6423-4136-9696-f87408c95866
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R.P. Hastings
Author:
B. Remington
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics