The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Classical vs. modern managerial CSR perspectives: insights from Lebanese context and cross-cultural implications

Classical vs. modern managerial CSR perspectives: insights from Lebanese context and cross-cultural implications
Classical vs. modern managerial CSR perspectives: insights from Lebanese context and cross-cultural implications
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a concept that has acquired a new resonance in the global economy. With the advent of globalization, managers in different contexts have been exposed to the notion of CSR and are being pressured to adopt CSR initiatives. Yet in view of vastly differing national cultures and institutional realities, mixed orientations to CSR continue to be salient in different contexts, oscillating between the classical perspective which considers CSR as a burden on competitiveness and the modern perspective that views CSR as instrumental for business success. Capitalizing on the two-dimensional CSR model developed by Quazi and O'Brien, Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 33–51 (2000), this article attempts to gauge managerial perspectives toward CSR in Lebanon. An empirical study of 119 Lebanese managers reveals that the majority of respondents (83 percent) are favorably inclined toward CSR with about 20 percent adhering to the modern paradigm, more than 50 percent adhering to a philanthropic view and 18 percent fitting into the classical camp. The findings are discussed and cross-cultural implications drawn accordingly.
0045-3609
329-346
Jamali, Dima
cddcdb14-bb36-4423-a766-0b1e1d7985ba
Sidani, Yusuf
f7073a54-3870-44f1-8f39-1e8125795bea
Jamali, Dima
cddcdb14-bb36-4423-a766-0b1e1d7985ba
Sidani, Yusuf
f7073a54-3870-44f1-8f39-1e8125795bea

Jamali, Dima and Sidani, Yusuf (2008) Classical vs. modern managerial CSR perspectives: insights from Lebanese context and cross-cultural implications. Business and Society Review, 113 (3), 329-346. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00323.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a concept that has acquired a new resonance in the global economy. With the advent of globalization, managers in different contexts have been exposed to the notion of CSR and are being pressured to adopt CSR initiatives. Yet in view of vastly differing national cultures and institutional realities, mixed orientations to CSR continue to be salient in different contexts, oscillating between the classical perspective which considers CSR as a burden on competitiveness and the modern perspective that views CSR as instrumental for business success. Capitalizing on the two-dimensional CSR model developed by Quazi and O'Brien, Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 33–51 (2000), this article attempts to gauge managerial perspectives toward CSR in Lebanon. An empirical study of 119 Lebanese managers reveals that the majority of respondents (83 percent) are favorably inclined toward CSR with about 20 percent adhering to the modern paradigm, more than 50 percent adhering to a philanthropic view and 18 percent fitting into the classical camp. The findings are discussed and cross-cultural implications drawn accordingly.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 3 September 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 58208
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58208
ISSN: 0045-3609
PURE UUID: f4293ae0-fdcb-403d-9d78-65287303ab39

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Oct 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dima Jamali
Author: Yusuf Sidani

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×