Statistical assessment of numerical models
Statistical assessment of numerical models
Evaluation of physically based computer models for air quality applications is crucial to assist in control strategy selection. The high risk of getting the wrong control strategy has costly economic and social consequences. The objective comparison of modeled concentrations with observed field data is one approach to assessment of model performance. For dry deposition fluxes and concentrations of air pollutants there is a very limited supply of evaluation data sets. We develop a formal method for evaluation of the performance of numerical models, which can be implemented even when the field measurements are very sparse. This approach is applied to a current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency air quality model. In other cases, exemplified by an ozone study from the California Central Valley, the observed field is relatively data rich, and more or less standard geostatistical tools can be used to compare model to data. Yet another situation is when the cost of model runs is prohibitive, and a statistical approach to approximating the model output is needed. We describe two ways of obtaining such approximations.
A common technical issue in the assessment of environmental numerical models is the need for tools to estimate nonstationary spatial covariance structures. We describe in detail two such approaches.
201-221
Fuentes, M.
74a45d9c-c94a-469a-92ee-1a0c3b2474b3
Guttorp, P.
0cfae510-5eea-43b9-bc37-ae687bf9f30a
Challenor, P.
a7e71e56-8391-442c-b140-6e4b90c33547
2002
Fuentes, M.
74a45d9c-c94a-469a-92ee-1a0c3b2474b3
Guttorp, P.
0cfae510-5eea-43b9-bc37-ae687bf9f30a
Challenor, P.
a7e71e56-8391-442c-b140-6e4b90c33547
Abstract
Evaluation of physically based computer models for air quality applications is crucial to assist in control strategy selection. The high risk of getting the wrong control strategy has costly economic and social consequences. The objective comparison of modeled concentrations with observed field data is one approach to assessment of model performance. For dry deposition fluxes and concentrations of air pollutants there is a very limited supply of evaluation data sets. We develop a formal method for evaluation of the performance of numerical models, which can be implemented even when the field measurements are very sparse. This approach is applied to a current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency air quality model. In other cases, exemplified by an ozone study from the California Central Valley, the observed field is relatively data rich, and more or less standard geostatistical tools can be used to compare model to data. Yet another situation is when the cost of model runs is prohibitive, and a statistical approach to approximating the model output is needed. We describe two ways of obtaining such approximations.
A common technical issue in the assessment of environmental numerical models is the need for tools to estimate nonstationary spatial covariance structures. We describe in detail two such approaches.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2002
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 58454
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58454
ISSN: 0306-7734
PURE UUID: c14e1771-6dc5-4d10-b936-5144ee9a89e2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M. Fuentes
Author:
P. Guttorp
Author:
P. Challenor
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics