Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it compare with traditional paper methods?
Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it compare with traditional paper methods?
Quality assurance is integral to good teaching. It requires a commitment from students to provide regular feedback, and from teachers to analyze and act on information received. The organisation and analysis of student feedback is time-consuming and difficult to co-ordinate for a complex clinical course. Web-based feedback using a dedicated school web-site offers the advantage of ease of collation of student assessment ratings and comments. In Year 4 of the undergraduate course at Guys, Kings and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Kings College London, web-based student feedback of large group teaching was compared with traditional paper based methods using response rates and quality of assessments. The preference of teachers for both methods was assessed and their comments
sought. The advantages and disadvantages of both methods will be presented.
Graham, Helen
81ea8662-d074-4eee-ba47-2af3ac965b7c
Cobb, Stephanie
897bbf11-3c55-45da-90dc-15d58592fae1
1 January 1970
Graham, Helen
81ea8662-d074-4eee-ba47-2af3ac965b7c
Cobb, Stephanie
897bbf11-3c55-45da-90dc-15d58592fae1
Graham, Helen and Cobb, Stephanie
(1970)
Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it compare with traditional paper methods?
Association for Medical Education in Europe Conference: Medical Education and Standards at a Time of Change, Berlin, Germany.
01 - 04 Sep 2001.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Poster)
Abstract
Quality assurance is integral to good teaching. It requires a commitment from students to provide regular feedback, and from teachers to analyze and act on information received. The organisation and analysis of student feedback is time-consuming and difficult to co-ordinate for a complex clinical course. Web-based feedback using a dedicated school web-site offers the advantage of ease of collation of student assessment ratings and comments. In Year 4 of the undergraduate course at Guys, Kings and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Kings College London, web-based student feedback of large group teaching was compared with traditional paper based methods using response rates and quality of assessments. The preference of teachers for both methods was assessed and their comments
sought. The advantages and disadvantages of both methods will be presented.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 January 1970
Venue - Dates:
Association for Medical Education in Europe Conference: Medical Education and Standards at a Time of Change, Berlin, Germany, 2001-09-01 - 2001-09-04
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 58473
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58473
PURE UUID: cdffbf71-848f-43ee-8203-bc32de416875
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Aug 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 17:56
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Helen Graham
Author:
Stephanie Cobb
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics