The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Heavy gas dispersion: integral models and shallow layer models

Heavy gas dispersion: integral models and shallow layer models
Heavy gas dispersion: integral models and shallow layer models
Integral models for heavy gas dispersion approximate a dispersing cloud in terms of a small number of variables; each of these is ultimately a function of an independent variable which is usually time (instantaneous releases) or downwind distance (continuous releases).
This type of model is used almost exclusively in risk assessment [HSE’s risk assessment tool, RISKAT, in: Major Hazards: Onshore and Offshore, October 1992, pp. 607–638; Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21 (1989) 317], but many distinct integral models exist. The code comparison exercise of Mercer et al. [CEA/AEA exchange agreement on external event. Comparison of heavy gas dispersion models for instantaneous releases: final report, Technical Report IR/L/HA/91/6, Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, June 1991; J. Hazard. Mater. 36 (1994) 193] presented the results from a number of integral models in a common format; Mercer found that the range of predictions for some scenarios exceeded three orders of magnitude.
Here, the TWODEE shallow layer model [J. Hazard. Mater. 66 (3) (1999) 211; J. Hazard. Mater. 66 (3) (1999) 227; J. Hazard. Mater. 66 (3) (1999) 239] is added to Mercer’s code comparison exercise. The physical assumptions used in shallow layer models differ profoundly from those used in integral models and the implications of these differences for risk assessment are discussed.
TWODEE was used to simulate four representative cases considered by Mercer. In terms of cloud averaged concentration (CAC) vs. centroid position, the present model gave predictions that were consistent with the integral models used by Mercer.
As the model neglects horizontal diffusion for passive clouds, overprediction at large downwind distances was expected, but not generally observed.
Heavy gas dispersion, Shallow layer model, Integral models, Model comparison
0304-3894
1-10
Hankin, R.K.S.
296864a6-e423-44b6-ad0e-25422c913540
Hankin, R.K.S.
296864a6-e423-44b6-ad0e-25422c913540

Hankin, R.K.S. (2003) Heavy gas dispersion: integral models and shallow layer models. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 103 (1-2), 1-10. (doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00219-X).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Integral models for heavy gas dispersion approximate a dispersing cloud in terms of a small number of variables; each of these is ultimately a function of an independent variable which is usually time (instantaneous releases) or downwind distance (continuous releases).
This type of model is used almost exclusively in risk assessment [HSE’s risk assessment tool, RISKAT, in: Major Hazards: Onshore and Offshore, October 1992, pp. 607–638; Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21 (1989) 317], but many distinct integral models exist. The code comparison exercise of Mercer et al. [CEA/AEA exchange agreement on external event. Comparison of heavy gas dispersion models for instantaneous releases: final report, Technical Report IR/L/HA/91/6, Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, June 1991; J. Hazard. Mater. 36 (1994) 193] presented the results from a number of integral models in a common format; Mercer found that the range of predictions for some scenarios exceeded three orders of magnitude.
Here, the TWODEE shallow layer model [J. Hazard. Mater. 66 (3) (1999) 211; J. Hazard. Mater. 66 (3) (1999) 227; J. Hazard. Mater. 66 (3) (1999) 239] is added to Mercer’s code comparison exercise. The physical assumptions used in shallow layer models differ profoundly from those used in integral models and the implications of these differences for risk assessment are discussed.
TWODEE was used to simulate four representative cases considered by Mercer. In terms of cloud averaged concentration (CAC) vs. centroid position, the present model gave predictions that were consistent with the integral models used by Mercer.
As the model neglects horizontal diffusion for passive clouds, overprediction at large downwind distances was expected, but not generally observed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 October 2003
Keywords: Heavy gas dispersion, Shallow layer model, Integral models, Model comparison

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 58504
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58504
ISSN: 0304-3894
PURE UUID: 55b51991-8966-4044-a999-192f6f7a699d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R.K.S. Hankin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×