The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mortality risks in patients with constitutional autosomal chromosome deletions in Britain: a cohort study

Mortality risks in patients with constitutional autosomal chromosome deletions in Britain: a cohort study
Mortality risks in patients with constitutional autosomal chromosome deletions in Britain: a cohort study
Constitutional chromosome deletions result in wide ranging morbidity and often fatality. Information about risks and causes of death in these patients is important for counselling, and may illuminate the functions of the part of the chromosome deleted. There have been no cohort studies analysing mortality risks in persons with specific deletions compared with general population rates. We therefore conducted a cohort study following cause-specific mortality in 2,561 patients with autosomal chromosome deletions diagnosed by light microscopy or fluorescence in situ hybridisation at cytogenetic laboratories across Britain, 1965-2002. The commonest deletions were of 22q (544 patients), 15q (460) and 7q (210) and the least common 19q (0) and 20q (2). The prevalence of visible deletions of different chromosome arms was significantly inversely correlated with gene density of the arm (p 10 for deletions of 1p, 1q, 3p, 4p, 5q and 22q. Overall, 29% of deaths were due to congenital anomalies; significantly raised mortality occurred also from many other causes, varying by chromosome and arm of deletion. The data imply that viability of foetuses with visible chromosome deletions may be inversely related to gene density, and that all visible and fluorescence in situ hybridisation-detectable deletions lead to much raised mortality, but the extent and causes of mortality vary according to the specific deletion.
child, newborn, arm, chromosomes, genetics, risk factors, research, follow-up studies, prevalence, humans, risk, preschool, disease, Britain, adult, laboratories, infant, middle aged, male, population, research support, light, Great Britain, adolescent, microscopy, chromosome deletion, fluorescence, epidemiology, cohort, in situ hybridization, mortality, human, cancer, cohort studies, etiology, patients, congenital, female, morbidity
0340-6717
215-224
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
5f6c764b-1374-49d1-bcee-1bdae5f47b9d
Schoemaker, Minouk J.
d6949f41-d64c-4b46-aedb-d6a87c36797f
Higgins, Craig D.
93df71b7-f76b-4b16-9a5b-359ae84377d2
Wright, Alan F.
7efbb151-a98c-4398-b69f-92d5cac84f50
Jacobs, Patricia A.
d87ec15b-13c3-4868-96f1-b4b99030fa5b
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
5f6c764b-1374-49d1-bcee-1bdae5f47b9d
Schoemaker, Minouk J.
d6949f41-d64c-4b46-aedb-d6a87c36797f
Higgins, Craig D.
93df71b7-f76b-4b16-9a5b-359ae84377d2
Wright, Alan F.
7efbb151-a98c-4398-b69f-92d5cac84f50
Jacobs, Patricia A.
d87ec15b-13c3-4868-96f1-b4b99030fa5b

Swerdlow, Anthony J., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Higgins, Craig D., Wright, Alan F. and Jacobs, Patricia A. (2008) Mortality risks in patients with constitutional autosomal chromosome deletions in Britain: a cohort study. Human Genetics, 123 (2), 215-224. (doi:10.1007/s00439-008-0465-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Constitutional chromosome deletions result in wide ranging morbidity and often fatality. Information about risks and causes of death in these patients is important for counselling, and may illuminate the functions of the part of the chromosome deleted. There have been no cohort studies analysing mortality risks in persons with specific deletions compared with general population rates. We therefore conducted a cohort study following cause-specific mortality in 2,561 patients with autosomal chromosome deletions diagnosed by light microscopy or fluorescence in situ hybridisation at cytogenetic laboratories across Britain, 1965-2002. The commonest deletions were of 22q (544 patients), 15q (460) and 7q (210) and the least common 19q (0) and 20q (2). The prevalence of visible deletions of different chromosome arms was significantly inversely correlated with gene density of the arm (p 10 for deletions of 1p, 1q, 3p, 4p, 5q and 22q. Overall, 29% of deaths were due to congenital anomalies; significantly raised mortality occurred also from many other causes, varying by chromosome and arm of deletion. The data imply that viability of foetuses with visible chromosome deletions may be inversely related to gene density, and that all visible and fluorescence in situ hybridisation-detectable deletions lead to much raised mortality, but the extent and causes of mortality vary according to the specific deletion.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2008
Keywords: child, newborn, arm, chromosomes, genetics, risk factors, research, follow-up studies, prevalence, humans, risk, preschool, disease, Britain, adult, laboratories, infant, middle aged, male, population, research support, light, Great Britain, adolescent, microscopy, chromosome deletion, fluorescence, epidemiology, cohort, in situ hybridization, mortality, human, cancer, cohort studies, etiology, patients, congenital, female, morbidity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 60277
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/60277
ISSN: 0340-6717
PURE UUID: 4728364c-c56a-4b6c-afef-3c5cde59949c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Sep 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anthony J. Swerdlow
Author: Minouk J. Schoemaker
Author: Craig D. Higgins
Author: Alan F. Wright
Author: Patricia A. Jacobs

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×