The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of methods to detect recombination hotspots

A comparison of methods to detect recombination hotspots
A comparison of methods to detect recombination hotspots
OBJECTIVE: A number of linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based methods have been developed to describe recombination and infer hotspots. We determine the correspondence between LDMAP and LDhat, and between LDMAP and LDhot by comparison with linkage maps and hotspots that have been verified by sperm typing. METHODS: Regression and variance analyses were used to compare LDMAP and LDhat with linkage maps. The location and intensity of hotspots inferred by LDMAP and LDhot were compared with fifteen verified hotspots. RESULTS: Despite different methodologies and assumptions, LDMAP, LDhat, and linkage maps are highly concordant. Closer inspection shows that LDMAP corresponds more closely with linkage maps across the genome and on sixteen chromosomes compared with LDhat. LDhot identified fourteen and ten of the verified hotspots using high and low density maps. In comparison, LDMAP identified all fifteen hotspots at high and low density. However, some significant discrepancies between sperm and LD-based recombination rates remain. CONCLUSIONS: Combining information from linkage and LDMAP to construct sex-specific high resolution linkage maps suggests that some of these discrepancies may be due to female recombination while others may relate to the age of hotspots. LDMAP based estimates between approximately 68,000 and approximately 112,000 hotspots in the genome with mean widths less than 4 kb.
linkage, linkage disequilibrium map, population differences, recombination hot spot
0001-5652
157-169
Tapper, William
9d5ddc92-a8dd-4c78-ac67-c5867b62724c
Gibson, Jane
855033a6-38f3-4853-8f60-d7d4561226ae
Morton, Newton E.
c668e2be-074a-4a0a-a2ca-e8f51830ebb7
Collins, Andrew
7daa83eb-0b21-43b2-af1a-e38fb36e2a64
Tapper, William
9d5ddc92-a8dd-4c78-ac67-c5867b62724c
Gibson, Jane
855033a6-38f3-4853-8f60-d7d4561226ae
Morton, Newton E.
c668e2be-074a-4a0a-a2ca-e8f51830ebb7
Collins, Andrew
7daa83eb-0b21-43b2-af1a-e38fb36e2a64

Tapper, William, Gibson, Jane, Morton, Newton E. and Collins, Andrew (2008) A comparison of methods to detect recombination hotspots. Human Heredity, 66 (3), 157-169. (doi:10.1159/000126050).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A number of linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based methods have been developed to describe recombination and infer hotspots. We determine the correspondence between LDMAP and LDhat, and between LDMAP and LDhot by comparison with linkage maps and hotspots that have been verified by sperm typing. METHODS: Regression and variance analyses were used to compare LDMAP and LDhat with linkage maps. The location and intensity of hotspots inferred by LDMAP and LDhot were compared with fifteen verified hotspots. RESULTS: Despite different methodologies and assumptions, LDMAP, LDhat, and linkage maps are highly concordant. Closer inspection shows that LDMAP corresponds more closely with linkage maps across the genome and on sixteen chromosomes compared with LDhat. LDhot identified fourteen and ten of the verified hotspots using high and low density maps. In comparison, LDMAP identified all fifteen hotspots at high and low density. However, some significant discrepancies between sperm and LD-based recombination rates remain. CONCLUSIONS: Combining information from linkage and LDMAP to construct sex-specific high resolution linkage maps suggests that some of these discrepancies may be due to female recombination while others may relate to the age of hotspots. LDMAP based estimates between approximately 68,000 and approximately 112,000 hotspots in the genome with mean widths less than 4 kb.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2008
Keywords: linkage, linkage disequilibrium map, population differences, recombination hot spot

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 60286
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/60286
ISSN: 0001-5652
PURE UUID: 75ab3b2b-6916-4c43-a0e9-1736b8d5e79a
ORCID for William Tapper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-1889
ORCID for Jane Gibson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-8285
ORCID for Andrew Collins: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7108-0771

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Sep 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: William Tapper ORCID iD
Author: Jane Gibson ORCID iD
Author: Newton E. Morton
Author: Andrew Collins ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×