The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Dimethyl sulphide biogeochemistry within a coccolithophore bloom (DISCO): an overview

Dimethyl sulphide biogeochemistry within a coccolithophore bloom (DISCO): an overview
Dimethyl sulphide biogeochemistry within a coccolithophore bloom (DISCO): an overview
This paper presents an overview of dimethyl sulphide biogeochemistry within a coccolithophore bloom (DISCO), an integrated, multidisciplinary Lagrangian process study of the routes, rates and controls on the biogeochemical cycling of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) within a growing bloom of the coccolithophorid alga, Emiliania huxleyi. The Lagrangian study took place between 16 and 26 June 1999 in the northern North Sea. It was preceded by an 8-d survey of ~52,000 km2 of the region to locate an E. huxleyi bloom suitable for study. Although not originally planned, the survey was carried out because heavy cloud cover precluded use of remote sensing to locate a suitable bloom. E. huxleyi blooms, typically common in the region during mid-summer, were unusually sparse in the study area. The bloom chosen for the process study was initially centred ~58°56?N 02°52?E, and a 40-km2 patch of water was labelled for study with ~30 g sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) on 16 June. The original patch was reinfused with further SF6 on 24 June. During the process study, the SF6-labelled patch moved in a south-easterly direction and the study ended when the patch subducted underneath less dense Norwegian coastal water.
The process study comprised analyses of the time-varying biological, optical and physical properties of the patch as well as studies of DMS, dimethylsulphonioproprionate (DMSP), dimethylsulphoxide, nutrients, halocarbons, methylamines, carbon monoxide, dissolved organic carbon, and total dissolved nitrogen. The role of viruses, bacteria, phytoplankton, microzooplankton, and mesozooplankton, together with the dynamics of primary, new and bacterial production, plankton respiration, microzooplankton grazing, and sedimentation, were studied in relation to the biogeochemical cycling of DMS. Although the coccolithophore bloom water exhibited high optical backscatter, the algal community present was highly heterogeneous. Flagellates other than E. huxleyi were found to dominate the phytoplankton. A budget of the DMSP pools suggested that E. huxleyi accounted for only 13% of the stocks of particulate DMSP, showing that in this “E. huxleyi bloom”, taxa other than E. huxleyi were important sources of DMSP. In this young bloom, particulate and dissolved DMSP and DMS concentrations averaged 1360, 155 and 60 ?M m?2, respectively, in the surface mixed layer. Surface-water particulate DMSP concentrations increased during the study at a net rate of 13% d?1, as did concentrations of phytoplankton including E. huxleyi, confirming that the bloom was developing. Nutrient conditions were low in the mixed layer throughout the study, maintained by a strong pycnocline across which nitrate upflux was estimated to be ~2 nM dm?3 d?1. Primary production was fuelled by regenerated nutrients, although nitrification rates in surface waters were found to be significant. Microzooplankton grazing accounted for 91% of the particulate DMSP degradation and was considered to be a major control on the DMSP concentration. Vigorous microzooplankton grazing together with rapid uptake of dissolved DMSP by bacteria suggest that microzooplankton were the main route for the production of dissolved DMSP. The bacterial community was dominated by one taxon, an ? proteobacteria related to Roseobacter that satisfied its entire sulphur demand by metabolising dissolved DMSP. Bacteriogenic DMS production amounted to 2 nM d?1 and was considered the main route for DMS production. In vitro DMSPlyase activity was very high, but there was little evidence for high in situ activity. Over the study period, DMS flux to the atmosphere was estimated to be 7 ?M m?2 d?1, equivalent to ~1% of the DMSP sulphur produced in the surface mixed layer. A budget for DMS cycling in the upper mixed layer is presented based on the analytical and experimental measurements made in the DISCO study.
dimethyl sulphide, biogeochemistry, dms
0967-0645
2863-2885
Burkill, P.H.
91175019-8b55-4fb5-84ea-334c12de2557
Archer, S.D.
c6c2e5ef-bcca-4c45-91de-094e907d7e2e
Robinson, C.
3c57dfcb-6ddc-4e4b-8d7e-5efd0adcc42b
Nightingale, P.D.
7466ec1d-e0ce-47b1-8289-72497af5c31e
Groom, S.B.
dadc4558-ac45-494a-afad-6a6328d4f040
Tarran, G.A.
c6e9fb51-321c-4fb6-a2b0-00a58c344d73
Zubkov, M.V.
b1dfb3a0-bcff-430c-9031-358a22b50743
Burkill, P.H.
91175019-8b55-4fb5-84ea-334c12de2557
Archer, S.D.
c6c2e5ef-bcca-4c45-91de-094e907d7e2e
Robinson, C.
3c57dfcb-6ddc-4e4b-8d7e-5efd0adcc42b
Nightingale, P.D.
7466ec1d-e0ce-47b1-8289-72497af5c31e
Groom, S.B.
dadc4558-ac45-494a-afad-6a6328d4f040
Tarran, G.A.
c6e9fb51-321c-4fb6-a2b0-00a58c344d73
Zubkov, M.V.
b1dfb3a0-bcff-430c-9031-358a22b50743

Burkill, P.H., Archer, S.D., Robinson, C., Nightingale, P.D., Groom, S.B., Tarran, G.A. and Zubkov, M.V. (2002) Dimethyl sulphide biogeochemistry within a coccolithophore bloom (DISCO): an overview. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 49 (15), 2863-2885. (doi:10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00061-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of dimethyl sulphide biogeochemistry within a coccolithophore bloom (DISCO), an integrated, multidisciplinary Lagrangian process study of the routes, rates and controls on the biogeochemical cycling of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) within a growing bloom of the coccolithophorid alga, Emiliania huxleyi. The Lagrangian study took place between 16 and 26 June 1999 in the northern North Sea. It was preceded by an 8-d survey of ~52,000 km2 of the region to locate an E. huxleyi bloom suitable for study. Although not originally planned, the survey was carried out because heavy cloud cover precluded use of remote sensing to locate a suitable bloom. E. huxleyi blooms, typically common in the region during mid-summer, were unusually sparse in the study area. The bloom chosen for the process study was initially centred ~58°56?N 02°52?E, and a 40-km2 patch of water was labelled for study with ~30 g sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) on 16 June. The original patch was reinfused with further SF6 on 24 June. During the process study, the SF6-labelled patch moved in a south-easterly direction and the study ended when the patch subducted underneath less dense Norwegian coastal water.
The process study comprised analyses of the time-varying biological, optical and physical properties of the patch as well as studies of DMS, dimethylsulphonioproprionate (DMSP), dimethylsulphoxide, nutrients, halocarbons, methylamines, carbon monoxide, dissolved organic carbon, and total dissolved nitrogen. The role of viruses, bacteria, phytoplankton, microzooplankton, and mesozooplankton, together with the dynamics of primary, new and bacterial production, plankton respiration, microzooplankton grazing, and sedimentation, were studied in relation to the biogeochemical cycling of DMS. Although the coccolithophore bloom water exhibited high optical backscatter, the algal community present was highly heterogeneous. Flagellates other than E. huxleyi were found to dominate the phytoplankton. A budget of the DMSP pools suggested that E. huxleyi accounted for only 13% of the stocks of particulate DMSP, showing that in this “E. huxleyi bloom”, taxa other than E. huxleyi were important sources of DMSP. In this young bloom, particulate and dissolved DMSP and DMS concentrations averaged 1360, 155 and 60 ?M m?2, respectively, in the surface mixed layer. Surface-water particulate DMSP concentrations increased during the study at a net rate of 13% d?1, as did concentrations of phytoplankton including E. huxleyi, confirming that the bloom was developing. Nutrient conditions were low in the mixed layer throughout the study, maintained by a strong pycnocline across which nitrate upflux was estimated to be ~2 nM dm?3 d?1. Primary production was fuelled by regenerated nutrients, although nitrification rates in surface waters were found to be significant. Microzooplankton grazing accounted for 91% of the particulate DMSP degradation and was considered to be a major control on the DMSP concentration. Vigorous microzooplankton grazing together with rapid uptake of dissolved DMSP by bacteria suggest that microzooplankton were the main route for the production of dissolved DMSP. The bacterial community was dominated by one taxon, an ? proteobacteria related to Roseobacter that satisfied its entire sulphur demand by metabolising dissolved DMSP. Bacteriogenic DMS production amounted to 2 nM d?1 and was considered the main route for DMS production. In vitro DMSPlyase activity was very high, but there was little evidence for high in situ activity. Over the study period, DMS flux to the atmosphere was estimated to be 7 ?M m?2 d?1, equivalent to ~1% of the DMSP sulphur produced in the surface mixed layer. A budget for DMS cycling in the upper mixed layer is presented based on the analytical and experimental measurements made in the DISCO study.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2002
Keywords: dimethyl sulphide, biogeochemistry, dms
Organisations: National Oceanography Centre,Southampton

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 6031
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/6031
ISSN: 0967-0645
PURE UUID: c0f2658f-e429-4e3c-9469-5a9dc4b87eb7

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jun 2004
Last modified: 15 Jul 2019 19:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P.H. Burkill
Author: S.D. Archer
Author: C. Robinson
Author: P.D. Nightingale
Author: S.B. Groom
Author: G.A. Tarran
Author: M.V. Zubkov

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×