The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reanalysis of two studies with contrasting results on the association between statin use and fracture risk: the General Practice Research Database

de Vries, F., de Vries, C., Cooper, C., Leufkens, B. and van Staa, T.P. (2006) Reanalysis of two studies with contrasting results on the association between statin use and fracture risk: the General Practice Research Database International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, (5), pp. 1301-1308. (doi:10.1093/ije/dyl147).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two recent case-control studies by Meier et al. and van Staa et al. used the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) to examine the association between the use of statins and the risk of fractures, with different results. The objective of the present study was to examine methodological explanations for the discrepant results.
METHODS: We created two datasets, which mimicked the previous study designs: a 'selected population' (SP) case-control dataset, with fracture cases matched to controls nested within a selected cohort (Meier et al.), and an 'entire population' (EP) case-control dataset, with both cases and controls sampled from the total GPRD population (van Staa et al.). Cases and controls were matched by gender, age (year of birth or 5 year age bands), and general practice.
RESULTS: The study included 131 855 fracture cases. The crude odds ratio (OR) for hip fracture in statin users was 0.37 (95% CI 0.27-0.52) in the SP and 0.54 (95% CI 0.39-0.74) in the EP dataset. This difference was reduced when matching by year of birth, rather than by 5 year age bands: crude ORs were 0.58 (95% CI 0.43-0.79) and 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.88), respectively. In the SP dataset, 37% of the cases could be matched by year of birth, while this was achieved for 99% in the 'EP' dataset. The exposure time-window, the selection of confounders, and exclusion of high-risk patients also influenced results.
CONCLUSION: Residual confounding by a matching variable and different definitions of the exposure time window explained differences in results. In case-control studies of drug use and fracture risk, broad matching criteria for age should be avoided and the selection of the time-window for exposure should be carefully considered.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2006
Keywords: case-control studies, cohort, risk, birth, bone, fractures, exposure, hip, methods, research, gender, time, odds ratio

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61053
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61053
ISSN: 0300-5771
PURE UUID: e2f6f663-e60e-40e4-b05f-6462895f680f
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Sep 2008
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 14:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: F. de Vries
Author: C. de Vries
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: B. Leufkens
Author: T.P. van Staa

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×