The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Two-component models are of limited value for the assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis

Two-component models are of limited value for the assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis
Two-component models are of limited value for the assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis
Background: Most techniques for measuring body composition are based on 2-component models (2-CMs) and depend on assumptions relating to the constancy of the density (D-FFM) and hydration fraction (HFFFM) of fat-free mass (FFM). Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether these assumptions are systematically violated in patients with cirrhosis and to assess the validity of the estimates of body composition obtained in these patients by using 2-CM techniques. Design: Body composition was assessed by using a 4-component model (4-CM), which was based on data obtained from densitometry, deuterium dilution, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in 20 patients with cirrhosis who had no evidence of fluid retention and in 20 pair-matched healthy control subjects. The results were compared with those obtained by using "reference" and "bedside" 2-CM techniques. Results: The mean (+/- SD) D-FFM was significantly lower in the patients with cirrhosis (1.091 +/- 0.008 compared with 1.100 +/- 0.006 kg/L; P < 0.001); no significant difference in HFFFM was observed between the patients and control subjects (74.5 +/- 2.6 compared with 73.5 +/- 2.1), although there was greater variability in the patients. Significant differences were observed in the body-composition variables obtained by using the "reference" 2-CM techniques compared with the 4-CM-the 95% limits of agreement in the patients with cirrhosis exceeded 5% body fat and 3 kg FFM; the corresponding values for the "bedside" 2-CM techniques were 11% body fat and 7.5 kg FFM. Conclusions: Assumptions relating to the constancy of the DFFM and HFFFM are violated in patients with cirrhosis. Thus, standard 2-CM techniques provide inaccurate body composition estimates in this patient population
urinary creatinine, percentage fat mass, healthy control subjects, disease, bioelectrical-impedance analysis, fluid, x-ray absorptiometry, near-infrared interactance, water, deuterium dilution, england, density of fat-free mass, london, 4-component model, bioelectrical impedance analysis, fat-free mass, body composition, time, cirrhosis, bone-mineral metabolism, mass, deuterium, creatinine clearance, body-composition, nutrition, anthropometric measures, hydration of fat-free mass, densitometry, muscle mass, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, urine collections, liver-cirrhosis, validity
0002-9165
1151-1162
Morgan, M.Y.
a41742b9-29cb-49f6-96a3-0b2d7c445a28
Madden, A.M.
29718808-6ce6-4be5-bb4d-346868be2619
Lennings, G.
0826f928-9a96-4c3c-9728-2721deab60c0
Elia, M.
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Fuller, N.J.
e3e40db8-e5eb-45d9-aacb-d032efa14daf
Morgan, M.Y.
a41742b9-29cb-49f6-96a3-0b2d7c445a28
Madden, A.M.
29718808-6ce6-4be5-bb4d-346868be2619
Lennings, G.
0826f928-9a96-4c3c-9728-2721deab60c0
Elia, M.
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Fuller, N.J.
e3e40db8-e5eb-45d9-aacb-d032efa14daf

Morgan, M.Y., Madden, A.M., Lennings, G., Elia, M. and Fuller, N.J. (2006) Two-component models are of limited value for the assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 84 (5), 1151-1162.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Most techniques for measuring body composition are based on 2-component models (2-CMs) and depend on assumptions relating to the constancy of the density (D-FFM) and hydration fraction (HFFFM) of fat-free mass (FFM). Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether these assumptions are systematically violated in patients with cirrhosis and to assess the validity of the estimates of body composition obtained in these patients by using 2-CM techniques. Design: Body composition was assessed by using a 4-component model (4-CM), which was based on data obtained from densitometry, deuterium dilution, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in 20 patients with cirrhosis who had no evidence of fluid retention and in 20 pair-matched healthy control subjects. The results were compared with those obtained by using "reference" and "bedside" 2-CM techniques. Results: The mean (+/- SD) D-FFM was significantly lower in the patients with cirrhosis (1.091 +/- 0.008 compared with 1.100 +/- 0.006 kg/L; P < 0.001); no significant difference in HFFFM was observed between the patients and control subjects (74.5 +/- 2.6 compared with 73.5 +/- 2.1), although there was greater variability in the patients. Significant differences were observed in the body-composition variables obtained by using the "reference" 2-CM techniques compared with the 4-CM-the 95% limits of agreement in the patients with cirrhosis exceeded 5% body fat and 3 kg FFM; the corresponding values for the "bedside" 2-CM techniques were 11% body fat and 7.5 kg FFM. Conclusions: Assumptions relating to the constancy of the DFFM and HFFFM are violated in patients with cirrhosis. Thus, standard 2-CM techniques provide inaccurate body composition estimates in this patient population

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006
Keywords: urinary creatinine, percentage fat mass, healthy control subjects, disease, bioelectrical-impedance analysis, fluid, x-ray absorptiometry, near-infrared interactance, water, deuterium dilution, england, density of fat-free mass, london, 4-component model, bioelectrical impedance analysis, fat-free mass, body composition, time, cirrhosis, bone-mineral metabolism, mass, deuterium, creatinine clearance, body-composition, nutrition, anthropometric measures, hydration of fat-free mass, densitometry, muscle mass, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, urine collections, liver-cirrhosis, validity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61388
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61388
ISSN: 0002-9165
PURE UUID: 29fa3d0c-3732-4279-9726-0c385febec53

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Sep 2008
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 04:02

Export record

Contributors

Author: M.Y. Morgan
Author: A.M. Madden
Author: G. Lennings
Author: M. Elia
Author: N.J. Fuller

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×