The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Individual fracture risk and the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates in patients using oral glucocorticoids

Individual fracture risk and the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates in patients using oral glucocorticoids
Individual fracture risk and the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates in patients using oral glucocorticoids
OBJECTIVES: There are few data on the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates with oral glucocorticoids (GCs). An individual patient-based pharmaco-economic model was developed. METHODS: Data were obtained from a cohort of oral GC users aged 40+ (n = 190 000) in the UK General Practice Research Database. Individualized fracture and mortality risks were calculated specific for age, sex, daily and cumulative GC dose, indication and other clinical risk factors. UK costs of medication and direct costs of fracture were obtained from National Institute for Clinical Excellence and used to estimate costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and fracture prevented for bisphosphonates in patients treated for 5 yrs with GCs. RESULTS: With the use of 5 mg GCs daily, the cost per one QALY gained with bisphosphonates was 41k UK pounds (95% confidence intervals 22-72k) in women aged <60 [men 40k pounds (29-54k)], 17k pounds (13-24k) in women aged 60-79 [men 43k pounds (31-60k)], 5k pounds(3-6k) in women aged 80+ [men 35k pounds (25-46k)]. With 15 mg GC, these figures were 17k pounds (14-21k), 13k pounds (10-16k) and 15k pounds (9-26k) in women and 22k pounds (17-26k), 34 pounds (23-53k) and 33k pounds (27-42k) in men, respectively. When stratifying by overall fracture risk and life expectancy at the start of GC therapy, cost per QALY increased with decreasing life expectancy. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had comparatively better cost-effectiveness, given higher fracture risk and better life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates varied substantially. Bisphosphonates can be considered cost-effective in patients with higher fracture risks, such as elderly patients (with a life expectancy over 5 yrs), and younger patients with a fracture history, low body mass index, rheumatoid arthritis or using high GC doses.
1462-0324
460-466
van Staa, T.P.
31b8bfb4-4e1b-4a48-a5a6-90ca601b94af
Geusens, P.
4ff22618-fc20-494f-aa5d-2747d6b66f65
Zhang, B.
0944e483-9118-4f70-9815-acdcad5dfeec
Leufkens, H.G.M.
04854167-bea6-4508-a8e2-aeb920a2d6b1
Boonen, A.
939f0f30-960d-483e-aa0a-b972e178413b
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
van Staa, T.P.
31b8bfb4-4e1b-4a48-a5a6-90ca601b94af
Geusens, P.
4ff22618-fc20-494f-aa5d-2747d6b66f65
Zhang, B.
0944e483-9118-4f70-9815-acdcad5dfeec
Leufkens, H.G.M.
04854167-bea6-4508-a8e2-aeb920a2d6b1
Boonen, A.
939f0f30-960d-483e-aa0a-b972e178413b
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6

van Staa, T.P., Geusens, P., Zhang, B., Leufkens, H.G.M., Boonen, A. and Cooper, C. (2007) Individual fracture risk and the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates in patients using oral glucocorticoids. Rheumatology, 46 (3), 460-466. (doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel249).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There are few data on the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates with oral glucocorticoids (GCs). An individual patient-based pharmaco-economic model was developed. METHODS: Data were obtained from a cohort of oral GC users aged 40+ (n = 190 000) in the UK General Practice Research Database. Individualized fracture and mortality risks were calculated specific for age, sex, daily and cumulative GC dose, indication and other clinical risk factors. UK costs of medication and direct costs of fracture were obtained from National Institute for Clinical Excellence and used to estimate costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and fracture prevented for bisphosphonates in patients treated for 5 yrs with GCs. RESULTS: With the use of 5 mg GCs daily, the cost per one QALY gained with bisphosphonates was 41k UK pounds (95% confidence intervals 22-72k) in women aged <60 [men 40k pounds (29-54k)], 17k pounds (13-24k) in women aged 60-79 [men 43k pounds (31-60k)], 5k pounds(3-6k) in women aged 80+ [men 35k pounds (25-46k)]. With 15 mg GC, these figures were 17k pounds (14-21k), 13k pounds (10-16k) and 15k pounds (9-26k) in women and 22k pounds (17-26k), 34 pounds (23-53k) and 33k pounds (27-42k) in men, respectively. When stratifying by overall fracture risk and life expectancy at the start of GC therapy, cost per QALY increased with decreasing life expectancy. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had comparatively better cost-effectiveness, given higher fracture risk and better life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates varied substantially. Bisphosphonates can be considered cost-effective in patients with higher fracture risks, such as elderly patients (with a life expectancy over 5 yrs), and younger patients with a fracture history, low body mass index, rheumatoid arthritis or using high GC doses.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61579
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61579
ISSN: 1462-0324
PURE UUID: 20364da8-ccc2-4c35-840f-7c68e0ab19d0
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Oct 2008
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T.P. van Staa
Author: P. Geusens
Author: B. Zhang
Author: H.G.M. Leufkens
Author: A. Boonen
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×