Publication bias in studies of the short-term associations between ambient particulate matter and health effects
Publication bias in studies of the short-term associations between ambient particulate matter and health effects
Background: Time-series studies have shown short-term temporal associations between low levels of ambient particulate air pollution and adverse health effects. It is not known whether or to what extent this literature is affected by publication bias.
Methods: We obtained effect estimates from time-series studies published up to January 2002. These were summarized and examined for funnel plot asymmetry. We compared summary estimates between single-city and prospective multicity studies. Using 1 multicity study, we examined the sensitivity of summary estimates to alternative lag selection policies.
Results: We found evidence for publication bias among single-city studies of daily mortality, hospital admissions for chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), and incidence of cough symptom, but not for studies of lung function. Statistical correction for this bias reduced summary relative risk estimates for a 10 [mu]g/m3 increment of particulate matter less than 10 [mu]m aerodynamic diameter (PM10) as follows: daily mortality from 1.006 to 1.005 and admissions for COPD from 1.013 to 1.011; and odds ratio for cough from 1.025 to 1.015. Analysis of results from a large multicity study suggested that selection of positive estimates from a range of lags could increase summary estimates for PM10 and daily mortality by up to 130% above those based on nondirectional approaches.
Conclusion: We conclude that publication bias is present in single-city time-series studies of ambient particles. However, after correcting for publication bias statistically, associations between particles and adverse health effects remained positive and precisely estimated. Differential selection of positive lags may also inflate estimates.
health, publication bias
155-163
Anderson, H. Ross
2197f0c6-7670-4e83-b6d3-1233ac58f7db
Atkinson, Richard W.
e8e8e306-4ce1-4aed-be79-342213537bbc
Peacock, Janet L.
1cb1242c-7606-4f8e-86d0-d3cd2ceff782
Sweeting, Michael J.
00a91fae-1103-4ebc-a195-575f892d0034
Marston, Louise
258cc87f-2cf7-49de-9498-fc659a5ffde7
March 2005
Anderson, H. Ross
2197f0c6-7670-4e83-b6d3-1233ac58f7db
Atkinson, Richard W.
e8e8e306-4ce1-4aed-be79-342213537bbc
Peacock, Janet L.
1cb1242c-7606-4f8e-86d0-d3cd2ceff782
Sweeting, Michael J.
00a91fae-1103-4ebc-a195-575f892d0034
Marston, Louise
258cc87f-2cf7-49de-9498-fc659a5ffde7
Anderson, H. Ross, Atkinson, Richard W., Peacock, Janet L., Sweeting, Michael J. and Marston, Louise
(2005)
Publication bias in studies of the short-term associations between ambient particulate matter and health effects.
Epidemiology, 16 (2), .
Abstract
Background: Time-series studies have shown short-term temporal associations between low levels of ambient particulate air pollution and adverse health effects. It is not known whether or to what extent this literature is affected by publication bias.
Methods: We obtained effect estimates from time-series studies published up to January 2002. These were summarized and examined for funnel plot asymmetry. We compared summary estimates between single-city and prospective multicity studies. Using 1 multicity study, we examined the sensitivity of summary estimates to alternative lag selection policies.
Results: We found evidence for publication bias among single-city studies of daily mortality, hospital admissions for chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), and incidence of cough symptom, but not for studies of lung function. Statistical correction for this bias reduced summary relative risk estimates for a 10 [mu]g/m3 increment of particulate matter less than 10 [mu]m aerodynamic diameter (PM10) as follows: daily mortality from 1.006 to 1.005 and admissions for COPD from 1.013 to 1.011; and odds ratio for cough from 1.025 to 1.015. Analysis of results from a large multicity study suggested that selection of positive estimates from a range of lags could increase summary estimates for PM10 and daily mortality by up to 130% above those based on nondirectional approaches.
Conclusion: We conclude that publication bias is present in single-city time-series studies of ambient particles. However, after correcting for publication bias statistically, associations between particles and adverse health effects remained positive and precisely estimated. Differential selection of positive lags may also inflate estimates.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2005
Keywords:
health, publication bias
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 61647
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61647
ISSN: 1044-3983
PURE UUID: 85d8301c-a5ab-44f5-ac9f-02362eb8f010
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2008
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 21:15
Export record
Contributors
Author:
H. Ross Anderson
Author:
Richard W. Atkinson
Author:
Janet L. Peacock
Author:
Michael J. Sweeting
Author:
Louise Marston
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics