Why GPs refer patients to complementary medicine via the NHS: a qualitative exploration
Why GPs refer patients to complementary medicine via the NHS: a qualitative exploration
Background. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing. Access to CAM through primary care referral is common with some of these referrals occurring through existing NHS contracts. Yet currently little is understood about General Practitioners (GPs) referrals to CAM via an NHS contract.
Aim. This exploratory qualitative study was designed to explore UK GPs experiences of referring patients to CAM under an NHS contract.
Method. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 GPs in the UK, purposively sampled, who referred patients under an NHS contract to a private CAM clinic, staffed by medically qualified CAM practitioners. Qualitative methodology making use of the framework approach was used to undertake the interviews and analysis.
Findings. The decision of GPs to refer a patient to CAM through an NHS contract is complex and based on negotiation between patient and GP but is ultimately determined by the patients’ openness and motivation towards CAM. Most GPs would consider referral when there are no other therapeutic options for their patients. Various factors, including clinical evidence, increase the likelihood of referral but two overarching influences are crucial: (a) the individual GPs positive attitude to, and experience of CAM, including a trusting relationship with the CAM practitioner; and (b) the patient’s attitude towards CAM. In-depth knowledge of CAM was not a vital factor for most GPs in the decision to refer.
Conclusion. A CAM referral only took place if the patient readily agreed with this therapeutic approach, and in this respect it may differ from referrals by GPs to conventional medicinal practitioners. Such an approach, then, relies on patients having a positive view of CAM and as such could result in inequity in treatment access. Increasing knowledge about and evidence for CAM will assist GPs in making appropriate referrals in a timely manner. We propose a preliminary model that explains our findings about referrals considering patients need as well as the medical process. As data saturation may not have been achieved, further investigation is warranted to confirm or refute these suggestions.
complementary and alternative medicine, primary health care, qualitative research, referral
205-215
Brien, Sarah
4e8e97cd-7bc3-4efd-857e-20790040b80f
Howells, Emily
462ca799-e3b8-48eb-821b-a3282bd83227
Leydon, Geraldine M.
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
July 2008
Brien, Sarah
4e8e97cd-7bc3-4efd-857e-20790040b80f
Howells, Emily
462ca799-e3b8-48eb-821b-a3282bd83227
Leydon, Geraldine M.
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Brien, Sarah, Howells, Emily, Leydon, Geraldine M. and Lewith, George
(2008)
Why GPs refer patients to complementary medicine via the NHS: a qualitative exploration.
Primary Health Care Research & Development, 9 (3), .
(doi:10.1017/S1463423608000789).
Abstract
Background. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing. Access to CAM through primary care referral is common with some of these referrals occurring through existing NHS contracts. Yet currently little is understood about General Practitioners (GPs) referrals to CAM via an NHS contract.
Aim. This exploratory qualitative study was designed to explore UK GPs experiences of referring patients to CAM under an NHS contract.
Method. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 GPs in the UK, purposively sampled, who referred patients under an NHS contract to a private CAM clinic, staffed by medically qualified CAM practitioners. Qualitative methodology making use of the framework approach was used to undertake the interviews and analysis.
Findings. The decision of GPs to refer a patient to CAM through an NHS contract is complex and based on negotiation between patient and GP but is ultimately determined by the patients’ openness and motivation towards CAM. Most GPs would consider referral when there are no other therapeutic options for their patients. Various factors, including clinical evidence, increase the likelihood of referral but two overarching influences are crucial: (a) the individual GPs positive attitude to, and experience of CAM, including a trusting relationship with the CAM practitioner; and (b) the patient’s attitude towards CAM. In-depth knowledge of CAM was not a vital factor for most GPs in the decision to refer.
Conclusion. A CAM referral only took place if the patient readily agreed with this therapeutic approach, and in this respect it may differ from referrals by GPs to conventional medicinal practitioners. Such an approach, then, relies on patients having a positive view of CAM and as such could result in inequity in treatment access. Increasing knowledge about and evidence for CAM will assist GPs in making appropriate referrals in a timely manner. We propose a preliminary model that explains our findings about referrals considering patients need as well as the medical process. As data saturation may not have been achieved, further investigation is warranted to confirm or refute these suggestions.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: July 2008
Keywords:
complementary and alternative medicine, primary health care, qualitative research, referral
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 61684
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61684
ISSN: 1463-4236
PURE UUID: 191e63bc-45b4-439e-a460-046887e6eae5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Sep 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Emily Howells
Author:
George Lewith
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics