The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Why GPs refer patients to complementary medicine via the NHS: a qualitative exploration

Why GPs refer patients to complementary medicine via the NHS: a qualitative exploration
Why GPs refer patients to complementary medicine via the NHS: a qualitative exploration
Background. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing. Access to CAM through primary care referral is common with some of these referrals occurring through existing NHS contracts. Yet currently little is understood about General Practitioners (GPs) referrals to CAM via an NHS contract.
Aim. This exploratory qualitative study was designed to explore UK GPs experiences of referring patients to CAM under an NHS contract.
Method. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 GPs in the UK, purposively sampled, who referred patients under an NHS contract to a private CAM clinic, staffed by medically qualified CAM practitioners. Qualitative methodology making use of the framework approach was used to undertake the interviews and analysis.
Findings. The decision of GPs to refer a patient to CAM through an NHS contract is complex and based on negotiation between patient and GP but is ultimately determined by the patients’ openness and motivation towards CAM. Most GPs would consider referral when there are no other therapeutic options for their patients. Various factors, including clinical evidence, increase the likelihood of referral but two overarching influences are crucial: (a) the individual GPs positive attitude to, and experience of CAM, including a trusting relationship with the CAM practitioner; and (b) the patient’s attitude towards CAM. In-depth knowledge of CAM was not a vital factor for most GPs in the decision to refer.
Conclusion. A CAM referral only took place if the patient readily agreed with this therapeutic approach, and in this respect it may differ from referrals by GPs to conventional medicinal practitioners. Such an approach, then, relies on patients having a positive view of CAM and as such could result in inequity in treatment access. Increasing knowledge about and evidence for CAM will assist GPs in making appropriate referrals in a timely manner. We propose a preliminary model that explains our findings about referrals considering patients need as well as the medical process. As data saturation may not have been achieved, further investigation is warranted to confirm or refute these suggestions.
complementary and alternative medicine, primary health care, qualitative research, referral
1463-4236
205-215
Brien, Sarah
4e8e97cd-7bc3-4efd-857e-20790040b80f
Howells, Emily
462ca799-e3b8-48eb-821b-a3282bd83227
Leydon, Geraldine M.
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Brien, Sarah
4e8e97cd-7bc3-4efd-857e-20790040b80f
Howells, Emily
462ca799-e3b8-48eb-821b-a3282bd83227
Leydon, Geraldine M.
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625

Brien, Sarah, Howells, Emily, Leydon, Geraldine M. and Lewith, George (2008) Why GPs refer patients to complementary medicine via the NHS: a qualitative exploration. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 9 (3), 205-215. (doi:10.1017/S1463423608000789).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing. Access to CAM through primary care referral is common with some of these referrals occurring through existing NHS contracts. Yet currently little is understood about General Practitioners (GPs) referrals to CAM via an NHS contract.
Aim. This exploratory qualitative study was designed to explore UK GPs experiences of referring patients to CAM under an NHS contract.
Method. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 GPs in the UK, purposively sampled, who referred patients under an NHS contract to a private CAM clinic, staffed by medically qualified CAM practitioners. Qualitative methodology making use of the framework approach was used to undertake the interviews and analysis.
Findings. The decision of GPs to refer a patient to CAM through an NHS contract is complex and based on negotiation between patient and GP but is ultimately determined by the patients’ openness and motivation towards CAM. Most GPs would consider referral when there are no other therapeutic options for their patients. Various factors, including clinical evidence, increase the likelihood of referral but two overarching influences are crucial: (a) the individual GPs positive attitude to, and experience of CAM, including a trusting relationship with the CAM practitioner; and (b) the patient’s attitude towards CAM. In-depth knowledge of CAM was not a vital factor for most GPs in the decision to refer.
Conclusion. A CAM referral only took place if the patient readily agreed with this therapeutic approach, and in this respect it may differ from referrals by GPs to conventional medicinal practitioners. Such an approach, then, relies on patients having a positive view of CAM and as such could result in inequity in treatment access. Increasing knowledge about and evidence for CAM will assist GPs in making appropriate referrals in a timely manner. We propose a preliminary model that explains our findings about referrals considering patients need as well as the medical process. As data saturation may not have been achieved, further investigation is warranted to confirm or refute these suggestions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2008
Keywords: complementary and alternative medicine, primary health care, qualitative research, referral

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61684
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61684
ISSN: 1463-4236
PURE UUID: 191e63bc-45b4-439e-a460-046887e6eae5
ORCID for Sarah Brien: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-2364
ORCID for Geraldine M. Leydon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5986-3300

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sarah Brien ORCID iD
Author: Emily Howells
Author: George Lewith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×