The role of physical examination in the diagnosis of work-related upper limb musculoskeletal disorders
The role of physical examination in the diagnosis of work-related upper limb musculoskeletal disorders
BACKGROUND: This paper argues that diagnostic criteria for upper limb disorders should be assessed according to their practical utility in distinguishing categories of illness that differ in their risk factors or in their prognosis and response to treatment.
METHODS: The starting point for defining disorders could be current clinical practice or empirical demonstration that certain symptoms and physical signs tend to cluster abnormally within individuals. Either way, it is necessary to test the performance of proposed diagnostic criteria in discriminating illness with distinctive risk factors or clinical outcomes. It is also important that diagnoses be repeatable within and between observers, at least in the short-term. Thus, methods for eliciting physical signs should as far as possible be standardised. To facilitate comparison between studies, it would help if consensus could be reached on the definitions and methods for eliciting relevant physical signs.
CONCLUSION: Currently, a wide range of upper limb disorders are distinguished by clinicians, but opinions differ on the entities that should make up diagnostic classifications, and on the criteria by which each entity should be defined. This paper considers the approaches by which epidemiologists should define and evaluate possible diagnostic systems, focusing in particular on the contribution to case definition from physical examination
epidemiology, occupational diseases, physical examination, methods, risk factors, treatment, humans, risk, paper, arm, classification, musculoskeletal diseases, prognosis, role, diagnosis
94-97
Coggon, D.
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
2007
Coggon, D.
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
Coggon, D.
(2007)
The role of physical examination in the diagnosis of work-related upper limb musculoskeletal disorders.
La Medicina del Lavoro, 98 (2), .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This paper argues that diagnostic criteria for upper limb disorders should be assessed according to their practical utility in distinguishing categories of illness that differ in their risk factors or in their prognosis and response to treatment.
METHODS: The starting point for defining disorders could be current clinical practice or empirical demonstration that certain symptoms and physical signs tend to cluster abnormally within individuals. Either way, it is necessary to test the performance of proposed diagnostic criteria in discriminating illness with distinctive risk factors or clinical outcomes. It is also important that diagnoses be repeatable within and between observers, at least in the short-term. Thus, methods for eliciting physical signs should as far as possible be standardised. To facilitate comparison between studies, it would help if consensus could be reached on the definitions and methods for eliciting relevant physical signs.
CONCLUSION: Currently, a wide range of upper limb disorders are distinguished by clinicians, but opinions differ on the entities that should make up diagnostic classifications, and on the criteria by which each entity should be defined. This paper considers the approaches by which epidemiologists should define and evaluate possible diagnostic systems, focusing in particular on the contribution to case definition from physical examination
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2007
Keywords:
epidemiology, occupational diseases, physical examination, methods, risk factors, treatment, humans, risk, paper, arm, classification, musculoskeletal diseases, prognosis, role, diagnosis
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 61734
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61734
ISSN: 0025-7818
PURE UUID: c97946ac-6489-4a6d-bc49-49c61158976b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2008
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 02:51
Export record
Contributors
Author:
D. Coggon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics