The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Bereavement care in general practice: a survey in South Thames Health Region

Bereavement care in general practice: a survey in South Thames Health Region
Bereavement care in general practice: a survey in South Thames Health Region
Background. Studies have shown that bereaved individuals suffer increased rates of physical and mental ill health. Bereavement support has recently been advocated as an area of prevention in primary care, with suggestions that general practitioners (GPs) should adopt protocols for the active follow-up of their bereaved patients, which relies on the early notification of deaths by hospitals and hospices. Little is known about the routine care currently provided by GPs and primary health care teams (PHCTs) to support their bereaved patients. Aims. To explore GPs' perceptions of patient death notifications by hospitals and hospices. To describe practice policies relating to patient deaths and the provision of bereavement support. Method Postal questionnaires were sent to senior partners of a random sample of 500 general practices in South Thames Health Region. Results. Three hundred and fifty-three practitioners responded (71%). Hospitals were perceived to be significantly slower than hospices in notifying deaths (P<0.0001). One hundred and ninety-six practices (56%) kept death registers, 230 (65%) discussed deaths together, and 142 (40%) identified bereaved relatives. One hundred and thirty-seven practices (39%) routinely offered bereaved relatives contact with a PHCT member; while 133 (38%) supported only those who asked for help. Routine support was significantly more likely to be provided by practices that kept a death register, discussed deaths together, identified bereaved relatives, and had a special interest in palliative care. Conclusions. GPs perceive hospitals to be slower than hospices at notifying deaths, particularly in the first 24 hours. They are divided over whether bereavement support should be proactive or reactive. Keeping a practice death register, discussing deaths together, and identifying newly bereaved relatives are activities related to providing routine bereavement care
general practice, patients, gps, activity, primary health care, london, follow up, primary-care, england, intervention, general-practitioners, health care, hospitals, deaths, bereavement support, health, time, primary care, questionnaire, death, follow-up, questionnaires, bereavement, notification of death, palliative care, general-practice, prevention, questionnaire survey, widowers, care, policy, hospices, perception, practitioners
0960-1643
1560-1564
Harris, T.
36d8e752-4ee5-4f4c-8016-4defa753ea18
Kendrick, T.
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
Harris, T.
36d8e752-4ee5-4f4c-8016-4defa753ea18
Kendrick, T.
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5

Harris, T. and Kendrick, T. (1998) Bereavement care in general practice: a survey in South Thames Health Region. British Journal of General Practice, 48 (434), 1560-1564.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background. Studies have shown that bereaved individuals suffer increased rates of physical and mental ill health. Bereavement support has recently been advocated as an area of prevention in primary care, with suggestions that general practitioners (GPs) should adopt protocols for the active follow-up of their bereaved patients, which relies on the early notification of deaths by hospitals and hospices. Little is known about the routine care currently provided by GPs and primary health care teams (PHCTs) to support their bereaved patients. Aims. To explore GPs' perceptions of patient death notifications by hospitals and hospices. To describe practice policies relating to patient deaths and the provision of bereavement support. Method Postal questionnaires were sent to senior partners of a random sample of 500 general practices in South Thames Health Region. Results. Three hundred and fifty-three practitioners responded (71%). Hospitals were perceived to be significantly slower than hospices in notifying deaths (P<0.0001). One hundred and ninety-six practices (56%) kept death registers, 230 (65%) discussed deaths together, and 142 (40%) identified bereaved relatives. One hundred and thirty-seven practices (39%) routinely offered bereaved relatives contact with a PHCT member; while 133 (38%) supported only those who asked for help. Routine support was significantly more likely to be provided by practices that kept a death register, discussed deaths together, identified bereaved relatives, and had a special interest in palliative care. Conclusions. GPs perceive hospitals to be slower than hospices at notifying deaths, particularly in the first 24 hours. They are divided over whether bereavement support should be proactive or reactive. Keeping a practice death register, discussing deaths together, and identifying newly bereaved relatives are activities related to providing routine bereavement care

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1998
Keywords: general practice, patients, gps, activity, primary health care, london, follow up, primary-care, england, intervention, general-practitioners, health care, hospitals, deaths, bereavement support, health, time, primary care, questionnaire, death, follow-up, questionnaires, bereavement, notification of death, palliative care, general-practice, prevention, questionnaire survey, widowers, care, policy, hospices, perception, practitioners

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61812
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61812
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: ba8e382a-3901-4274-9858-cbafa66f3ba9
ORCID for T. Kendrick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-9381

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Sep 2008
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 02:57

Export record

Contributors

Author: T. Harris
Author: T. Kendrick ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×