Joyce, Rachel, Webb, R. and Peacock, Janet
Predictors of obstetric intervention rates: case-mix, staffing levels and organisational factors of hospital of birth
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 22, (6), . (doi:10.1080/0144361021000020385).
Full text not available from this repository.
We performed a cross-sectional study of all Thames maternity units, 1994-96, including 540,834 live and stillbirths. In contrast to recent media speculation, no association of caesarean section rates with midwifery staffing levels was found after adjustment for confounders. The only association with staffing was with levels of junior obstetric staffing, which could be a reflection of less experienced management of labour. Caesarean section rates were also associated positively with the levels of delivery beds, which could be a reflection of the closer monitoring of labour that may result from increased bed availability. Both caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery rates were associated with epidural rates, which was expected from the literature. Variations in epidural rates were mainly associated with variations in demographic case-mix, due possibly to patient demand. Demographic case-mix was also associated with instrumental vaginal deliveries but not the caesarean section rate
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):
||cross-sectional studies, organization & administration, humans, pregnancy, female, obstetrics and gynecology department, obstetrical, health, epidural, standards, hospital, public health, literature, delivery, demand, london, diagnosis-related groups, utilization, extraction, vaginal delivery, midwifery, manpower, analgesia, cesarean section, england, birth
||10 Sep 2008
||16 Apr 2017 17:30
|Further Information:||Google Scholar|
Actions (login required)