The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The need to act versus reluctance to act: a qualitative study of primary care antidepressant prescribing for patients with common somatic conditions of uncertain cause

The need to act versus reluctance to act: a qualitative study of primary care antidepressant prescribing for patients with common somatic conditions of uncertain cause
The need to act versus reluctance to act: a qualitative study of primary care antidepressant prescribing for patients with common somatic conditions of uncertain cause
Background The National Institute for Clinical Excellence recently called on doctors to exercise more caution in prescribing antidepressants. Antidepressants are used in the management of patients with common somatic conditions of uncertain cause. The factors influencing the prescribing of antidepressants to this group of patients are not fully understood.
Aim To explore general practitioners' and mental health professionals' perspectives on the use of antidepressants for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic back pain (CBP).
Design of study A randomly selected sample of general practitioners and mental health practitioners in England were invited to participate in one of 16 focus group discussions. Clinical scenarios, including the use of antidepressants for patients with CFS, IBS and CBP, were discussed. Setting Meeting room, outside participants' work environment.
Methods Purposive sample of six groups. Each comprised 9-13 participants (49 GPs and 15 mental health practitioners). Group talk was thematically analysed to identify their views on antidepressant prescribing.
Results Two overarching and opposing themes emerged. The first was the need to act. Reasons for action included: lack of clear research evidence, desire to help patients, and a need for GPs to maintain their own self-worth. The second theme was a reluctance to act/prescribe antidepressants because of the potential for harm, their short-term effects and preference for somatic treatments for IBS and CBP.
Conclusions The perception that action is preferable to inaction poses a barrier to effective clinical practice and can lead to internal conflict between practitioners' beliefs and actions.
patients
131-142
Leydon, Geraldine M.
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Raine, Rosalind
fe76e3f8-b410-4370-9a74-37135c20a8b3
Leydon, Geraldine M.
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Raine, Rosalind
fe76e3f8-b410-4370-9a74-37135c20a8b3

Leydon, Geraldine M. and Raine, Rosalind (2006) The need to act versus reluctance to act: a qualitative study of primary care antidepressant prescribing for patients with common somatic conditions of uncertain cause. Primary Care Mental Health, 4 (2), 131-142.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background The National Institute for Clinical Excellence recently called on doctors to exercise more caution in prescribing antidepressants. Antidepressants are used in the management of patients with common somatic conditions of uncertain cause. The factors influencing the prescribing of antidepressants to this group of patients are not fully understood.
Aim To explore general practitioners' and mental health professionals' perspectives on the use of antidepressants for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic back pain (CBP).
Design of study A randomly selected sample of general practitioners and mental health practitioners in England were invited to participate in one of 16 focus group discussions. Clinical scenarios, including the use of antidepressants for patients with CFS, IBS and CBP, were discussed. Setting Meeting room, outside participants' work environment.
Methods Purposive sample of six groups. Each comprised 9-13 participants (49 GPs and 15 mental health practitioners). Group talk was thematically analysed to identify their views on antidepressant prescribing.
Results Two overarching and opposing themes emerged. The first was the need to act. Reasons for action included: lack of clear research evidence, desire to help patients, and a need for GPs to maintain their own self-worth. The second theme was a reluctance to act/prescribe antidepressants because of the potential for harm, their short-term effects and preference for somatic treatments for IBS and CBP.
Conclusions The perception that action is preferable to inaction poses a barrier to effective clinical practice and can lead to internal conflict between practitioners' beliefs and actions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: April 2006
Keywords: patients

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61933
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61933
PURE UUID: a7d54e31-d9bc-449a-933a-325ba84dc0e1
ORCID for Geraldine M. Leydon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5986-3300

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2008
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:54

Export record

Contributors

Author: Rosalind Raine

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×