Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care
Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care
Background
The inter-rater reliability of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) has not been examined in primary care settings with a view to using it as both a primary outcome measure and for determining entry into a trial.
Methods
A semi-structured interview for the HDRS with detailed questions and scoring rules was developed for use by lay interviewers. Interviews with patients with a range of scores on the HDRS were conducted by one interviewer, audiotaped and rated by a second interviewer. 84 ratings were made by 4 raters on 42 primary care patients over 4 sessions, giving comparisons for 10 rater pairs.
Results
The intraclass coefficient and concordance coefficient for the total HDRS score were both 0.95, with a 95% reference interval for the difference (between any pair of raters) in total HDRS score of ? 3.31 to 3.69; measurement error in an individual total score was 1.25. Inter-rater reliability did not vary with severity of depression and there was no evidence of bias in rating in any rater compared to the others. Weighted kappa coefficients for individual items were close to 0.6 (good) or above for all items except hypochondriasis and insight.
Limitations
The inter-rater reliability of the retardation and agitation items was not assessed.
Conclusions
In primary care, the 17-item HDRS delivered using a standardised interview has high overall inter-rater reliability as a primary outcome measure but a few patients may be erroneously excluded if it is used to determine study entry.
depression, primary care, reliability, psychometrics
204-213
Morriss, Richard
fb48ce6f-f557-4e5d-a309-5eb7f6ee6c2e
Leese, Morven
0bd95098-5280-41b4-91cf-c7ed9dd272c7
Chatwin, Judy
c828a7b0-e6c6-4229-b7b3-384feb083b76
Baldwin, David
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
December 2008
Morriss, Richard
fb48ce6f-f557-4e5d-a309-5eb7f6ee6c2e
Leese, Morven
0bd95098-5280-41b4-91cf-c7ed9dd272c7
Chatwin, Judy
c828a7b0-e6c6-4229-b7b3-384feb083b76
Baldwin, David
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Morriss, Richard, Leese, Morven, Chatwin, Judy and Baldwin, David
,
The THREAD Study Group
(2008)
Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care.
Journal of Affective Disorders, 111 (2-3), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.013).
(PMID:18374987)
Abstract
Background
The inter-rater reliability of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) has not been examined in primary care settings with a view to using it as both a primary outcome measure and for determining entry into a trial.
Methods
A semi-structured interview for the HDRS with detailed questions and scoring rules was developed for use by lay interviewers. Interviews with patients with a range of scores on the HDRS were conducted by one interviewer, audiotaped and rated by a second interviewer. 84 ratings were made by 4 raters on 42 primary care patients over 4 sessions, giving comparisons for 10 rater pairs.
Results
The intraclass coefficient and concordance coefficient for the total HDRS score were both 0.95, with a 95% reference interval for the difference (between any pair of raters) in total HDRS score of ? 3.31 to 3.69; measurement error in an individual total score was 1.25. Inter-rater reliability did not vary with severity of depression and there was no evidence of bias in rating in any rater compared to the others. Weighted kappa coefficients for individual items were close to 0.6 (good) or above for all items except hypochondriasis and insight.
Limitations
The inter-rater reliability of the retardation and agitation items was not assessed.
Conclusions
In primary care, the 17-item HDRS delivered using a standardised interview has high overall inter-rater reliability as a primary outcome measure but a few patients may be erroneously excluded if it is used to determine study entry.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: December 2008
Keywords:
depression, primary care, reliability, psychometrics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 62001
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62001
ISSN: 0165-0327
PURE UUID: 117c5e69-7e52-468f-aa2d-5df6eaa61e49
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Apr 2009
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Richard Morriss
Author:
Morven Leese
Author:
Judy Chatwin
Corporate Author: The THREAD Study Group
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics