Airway resistance estimation by best fit analysis in very premature infants

Thomas, M., Greenough, A., Blowes, R., Rafferty, G.F., Calvert, S., Marlow, N., Peacock, J.L. and Milner, A.D. (2002) Airway resistance estimation by best fit analysis in very premature infants. Physiological Measurement, 23 (2), 279-285. (doi:10.1088/0967-3334/23/2/304).

Abstract

Plethysmographic measurement of airway resistance (R(aw)) has been determined by single-point analysis, usually at 50% of maximum inspiratory flow (MIF). Computer-assisted (best fit) analysis, however, allows R(aw) to be calculated by applying a regression line to any portion of the plethysmograph pressure-flow loop. We determined whether the results of best fit analysis using a computer program, sampling at 200 Hz, were influenced by the portion of the inspiratory loop analysed and if best fit or single-point analysis gave more reproducible results. Twenty infants of median gestational age 26 (range 24-28) weeks, were studied at a median age of 12 (12-14) months corrected for prematurity. R(aw) was calculated by best fit analysis between 0 and 33% MIF, 0 and 50% MIF and 0 and 67% MIF and single-point analysis at 50% of MIF. Similar mean R(aw) values were obtained by best fit analysis between 0 and 33% MIF (2.79 kPa/(l/s)) and 0 and 50% MIF (3.01 kPa/(l/s)) and single-point analysis at 50% MIF (2.86 kPa/(l/s)), but best fit analysis between 0 and 67% gave higher results (3.60 kPa/(l/s)), p < 0.0001. Within the linear portion of the inspiratory loop, the mean intrasubject coefficient of variation was lowest for best fit analysis between 0 and 50% MIF. Best fit computerized analysis between 0 and 50% MIF is recommended as the analysis of choice.

This record has no associated files available for download.

Contributors

Download statistics