The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Respiratory function of very prematurely born infants at follow up: influence of sex. [In: Fetal and Neonatal Edition]

Respiratory function of very prematurely born infants at follow up: influence of sex. [In: Fetal and Neonatal Edition]
Respiratory function of very prematurely born infants at follow up: influence of sex. [In: Fetal and Neonatal Edition]
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that male compared with female prematurely born infants would have worse lung function at follow up. DESIGN: Prospective follow up study. SETTING: Tertiary neonatal intensive care units PATIENTS: Seventy six infants, mean (SD) gestational age 26.4 (1.5) weeks, from the United Kingdom oscillation study. INTERVENTIONS: Lung function measurements at a corrected age of 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Airways resistance (Raw) and functional residual capacity (FRC(pleth)) measured by whole body plethysmography, specific conductance (sGaw) calculated from Raw and FRC(pleth), and FRC measured by a helium gas dilution technique (FRC(He)). RESULTS: The 42 male infants differed significantly from the 34 female infants in having a lower birth weight for gestation, requiring more days of ventilation, and a greater proportion being oxygen dependent at 36 weeks postmenstrual age and discharge. Furthermore, mean Raw and FRC(pleth) were significantly higher and mean sGaw significantly lower. After adjustment for birth and current size differences, the sex differences in FRC(pleth) and sGaw were 15% and 26% respectively and remained significant. CONCLUSION: Lung function at follow up of prematurely born infants is influenced by sex.
health, hypothesis, trial, follow-up studies, care, controlled-trial, resistance, premature, child, lung diseases, multicenter studies, research, lung, intensive care units, sensitivity and specificity, weight, research support, patients, design, newborn, diseases, prospective studies, airway resistance, respiration disorders, obstructive, birth weight, oxygen, sex characteristics, male, physiopathology, london, gestational age, female, infant, physiology, controlled trial, functional residual capacity, regression analysis, birth, humans, risk factors, sex
1359-2998
F197-F201
Thomas, M.R.
a138cfe3-bb21-4683-ad09-211a94bb20db
Marston, L.
1c52caaf-0f98-4a77-888c-602c1e6ee6d4
Rafferty, G.F.
37d10b07-9ae8-4029-9657-8599d057d1b7
Calvert, S.
db77fcc0-ff18-4116-921f-a50e34503e9f
Marlow, N.
c48e77d7-b764-4416-b868-2b78f7124c78
Peacock, J.L.
8362b3b1-458f-4152-936f-344ca1c7e0ba
Greenough, A.
8008d870-d219-4ebd-921b-c61d90573b98
Thomas, M.R.
a138cfe3-bb21-4683-ad09-211a94bb20db
Marston, L.
1c52caaf-0f98-4a77-888c-602c1e6ee6d4
Rafferty, G.F.
37d10b07-9ae8-4029-9657-8599d057d1b7
Calvert, S.
db77fcc0-ff18-4116-921f-a50e34503e9f
Marlow, N.
c48e77d7-b764-4416-b868-2b78f7124c78
Peacock, J.L.
8362b3b1-458f-4152-936f-344ca1c7e0ba
Greenough, A.
8008d870-d219-4ebd-921b-c61d90573b98

Thomas, M.R., Marston, L., Rafferty, G.F., Calvert, S., Marlow, N., Peacock, J.L. and Greenough, A. (2006) Respiratory function of very prematurely born infants at follow up: influence of sex. [In: Fetal and Neonatal Edition]. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 91 (3), F197-F201. (doi:10.1136/adc.2005.081927).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that male compared with female prematurely born infants would have worse lung function at follow up. DESIGN: Prospective follow up study. SETTING: Tertiary neonatal intensive care units PATIENTS: Seventy six infants, mean (SD) gestational age 26.4 (1.5) weeks, from the United Kingdom oscillation study. INTERVENTIONS: Lung function measurements at a corrected age of 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Airways resistance (Raw) and functional residual capacity (FRC(pleth)) measured by whole body plethysmography, specific conductance (sGaw) calculated from Raw and FRC(pleth), and FRC measured by a helium gas dilution technique (FRC(He)). RESULTS: The 42 male infants differed significantly from the 34 female infants in having a lower birth weight for gestation, requiring more days of ventilation, and a greater proportion being oxygen dependent at 36 weeks postmenstrual age and discharge. Furthermore, mean Raw and FRC(pleth) were significantly higher and mean sGaw significantly lower. After adjustment for birth and current size differences, the sex differences in FRC(pleth) and sGaw were 15% and 26% respectively and remained significant. CONCLUSION: Lung function at follow up of prematurely born infants is influenced by sex.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: May 2006
Keywords: health, hypothesis, trial, follow-up studies, care, controlled-trial, resistance, premature, child, lung diseases, multicenter studies, research, lung, intensive care units, sensitivity and specificity, weight, research support, patients, design, newborn, diseases, prospective studies, airway resistance, respiration disorders, obstructive, birth weight, oxygen, sex characteristics, male, physiopathology, london, gestational age, female, infant, physiology, controlled trial, functional residual capacity, regression analysis, birth, humans, risk factors, sex
Organisations: Medicine

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 62160
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62160
ISSN: 1359-2998
PURE UUID: 62951323-ac9a-4ac5-8c86-d3d8aee66d63

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Sep 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M.R. Thomas
Author: L. Marston
Author: G.F. Rafferty
Author: S. Calvert
Author: N. Marlow
Author: J.L. Peacock
Author: A. Greenough

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×