The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram compared with paroxetine in treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in the United Kingdom

Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram compared with paroxetine in treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in the United Kingdom
Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram compared with paroxetine in treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in the United Kingdom
BACKGROUND: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is associated with substantial economic burden. OBJECTIVE: To assess, from a societal perspective, the cost-effectiveness of escitalopram and paroxetine in the treatment of GAD in the UK. METHOD: A decision analytic model with a 9 month time horizon was adapted to the UK setting. Model inputs included drug- and nondrug-specific probabilities from head-to-head trial data, published literature, and expert opinion. Main outcome measures were success (response after 12 wk of treatment and no relapse during the following 24 wk) and costs. Resource use was based on National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidance for GAD patient management, and estimated unit costs came from standard national sources. Human capital approach was used to estimate costs of absence from work. The analysis was performed from the societal perspective. RESULTS: Escitalopram-treated patients were associated with 14.4% higher first-line treatment success and significantly lower discontinuation rates due to adverse events than were those treated with paroxetine. Treatment with escitalopram yielded lower expected costs with greater effectiveness compared with paroxetine. These clinical advantages led to less sick leave and resource use as a result of lower switch rates and use of secondary care. Total expected 9 month costs were 21408 ($2560 US) lower for escitalopram-treated patients than for paroxetine-treated patients. Sensitivity analyses on key parameters demonstrated robustness of the model. CONCLUSIONS: Escitalopram appears to be cost-effective compared with paroxetine in the treatment of GAD in the UK
paroxetine, generalized anxiety disorder, escitalopram, double-blind, generalized anxiety, health, management, gad, rates, burden, cost-effectiveness, adverse events, model, depression
1060-0280
1752-1758
Jorgensen, T.R.
e7cdba4f-7a23-4789-ad6a-e926516bbf2a
Stein, D.J.
908f8238-f5e4-4ea1-9f19-9be45feea5b6
Despiegel, N.
f76a617f-d06b-4aa8-8001-98ef786e8e3b
Drost, P.B.
15b9ca3c-1bde-4499-b94c-badc69a28a16
Hernels, M.E.H.
685622dd-63af-4a07-bee5-fb0018bd0c7c
Baldwin, D.S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Jorgensen, T.R.
e7cdba4f-7a23-4789-ad6a-e926516bbf2a
Stein, D.J.
908f8238-f5e4-4ea1-9f19-9be45feea5b6
Despiegel, N.
f76a617f-d06b-4aa8-8001-98ef786e8e3b
Drost, P.B.
15b9ca3c-1bde-4499-b94c-badc69a28a16
Hernels, M.E.H.
685622dd-63af-4a07-bee5-fb0018bd0c7c
Baldwin, D.S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e

Jorgensen, T.R., Stein, D.J., Despiegel, N., Drost, P.B., Hernels, M.E.H. and Baldwin, D.S. (2006) Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram compared with paroxetine in treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in the United Kingdom. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 40 (10), 1752-1758. (doi:10.1345/aph.1H156).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is associated with substantial economic burden. OBJECTIVE: To assess, from a societal perspective, the cost-effectiveness of escitalopram and paroxetine in the treatment of GAD in the UK. METHOD: A decision analytic model with a 9 month time horizon was adapted to the UK setting. Model inputs included drug- and nondrug-specific probabilities from head-to-head trial data, published literature, and expert opinion. Main outcome measures were success (response after 12 wk of treatment and no relapse during the following 24 wk) and costs. Resource use was based on National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidance for GAD patient management, and estimated unit costs came from standard national sources. Human capital approach was used to estimate costs of absence from work. The analysis was performed from the societal perspective. RESULTS: Escitalopram-treated patients were associated with 14.4% higher first-line treatment success and significantly lower discontinuation rates due to adverse events than were those treated with paroxetine. Treatment with escitalopram yielded lower expected costs with greater effectiveness compared with paroxetine. These clinical advantages led to less sick leave and resource use as a result of lower switch rates and use of secondary care. Total expected 9 month costs were 21408 ($2560 US) lower for escitalopram-treated patients than for paroxetine-treated patients. Sensitivity analyses on key parameters demonstrated robustness of the model. CONCLUSIONS: Escitalopram appears to be cost-effective compared with paroxetine in the treatment of GAD in the UK

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006
Keywords: paroxetine, generalized anxiety disorder, escitalopram, double-blind, generalized anxiety, health, management, gad, rates, burden, cost-effectiveness, adverse events, model, depression

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 62433
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62433
ISSN: 1060-0280
PURE UUID: 33091e87-9003-41e7-9e50-cc3f422e3157
ORCID for D.S. Baldwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Sep 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T.R. Jorgensen
Author: D.J. Stein
Author: N. Despiegel
Author: P.B. Drost
Author: M.E.H. Hernels
Author: D.S. Baldwin ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×