God in the marketplace: A reconsideration of Robert Watts as an early critic of J.S. Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
God in the marketplace: A reconsideration of Robert Watts as an early critic of J.S. Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
This article examines the arguments used by Robert Watts, a contemporary of John Stuart Mill, in his criticism of Mill's Utilitarianism. The pamphlet in which Watts expresses his views is a scarce and neglected work. Pioneering studies by J.C. Rees and J.B. Schneewind emphasize the importance of Mill's early critics for historians of nineteenth-century ethics and politial thought. Rees, however, confines his study to the responses to Mill's On Liberty. Schneewind's work is more comprehensive and does mention Watts, but without examining in detail the actual arguments that Watts uses. Further, while Watts criticizes Mill's ethical views from a theological standpoint the arguments he uses are philosophical in character. Watts should not be thought of as a major philosophical critic of Mill, but his relative neglect leaves a gap in the study of the reception of Mill's thought which this article is intended to fill
responses, time
487-504
Johnson, P.
86ce548e-709a-4965-860f-05562216006e
2006
Johnson, P.
86ce548e-709a-4965-860f-05562216006e
Johnson, P.
(2006)
God in the marketplace: A reconsideration of Robert Watts as an early critic of J.S. Mill's 'Utilitarianism'.
History of Political Thought, 27 (3), .
Abstract
This article examines the arguments used by Robert Watts, a contemporary of John Stuart Mill, in his criticism of Mill's Utilitarianism. The pamphlet in which Watts expresses his views is a scarce and neglected work. Pioneering studies by J.C. Rees and J.B. Schneewind emphasize the importance of Mill's early critics for historians of nineteenth-century ethics and politial thought. Rees, however, confines his study to the responses to Mill's On Liberty. Schneewind's work is more comprehensive and does mention Watts, but without examining in detail the actual arguments that Watts uses. Further, while Watts criticizes Mill's ethical views from a theological standpoint the arguments he uses are philosophical in character. Watts should not be thought of as a major philosophical critic of Mill, but his relative neglect leaves a gap in the study of the reception of Mill's thought which this article is intended to fill
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Keywords:
responses, time
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 62805
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62805
ISSN: 0143-781X
PURE UUID: 1ba38f0a-e9d3-47d5-80ee-6fb1bbad7d64
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Sep 2008
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 19:06
Export record
Contributors
Author:
P. Johnson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics