The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Karyotype is an independent prognostic factor in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): analysis of cytogenetic data from 1,235 patients on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial

Karyotype is an independent prognostic factor in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): analysis of cytogenetic data from 1,235 patients on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial
Karyotype is an independent prognostic factor in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): analysis of cytogenetic data from 1,235 patients on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial
Background: Pre-treatment cytogenetics is a known predictor of outcome in haematological malignancies. However, its value in adult ALL is generally limited to the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) translocation; mostly due to the low incidence of other recurrent chromosomal abnormalities.
Methods: Since 1993, cytogenetic data from patients enrolled on a joint MRC/ECOG trial have been collated and reviewed centrally in the UK and US. Karyotype data from patients registered before the Imatinib amendment were pooled using standard cytogenetic definitions and classification criteria.
Results: A successful cytogenetic result was achieved in 938/1235 (76%) cases; while 297 (24%) failed with <20 normal metaphases analyzed. Patients were classified into the following mutually exclusive groups: t(9;22)(q34;q11) n=193(21%); t(4;11)(q21;q23) n=50(5%); other MLL translocations n=11(1%), t(8;14)(q24;q32) and variants n=14(1%); t(1;19)(q23;p13) n=23(2%); T cell receptor translocations n=35(4%); low hypodiploidy (30–39 chromosomes) /near triploidy n=23(2%); high hyperdiploidy n=83(9%); tetraploidy n=12(1%); complex karyotype (>=5 aberrations) n=48(5%); other abnormal n=255(27%); normal n=191(20%). MRC and ECOG patients showed similar cytogenetic distributions, except for t(9;22), which was significantly more prevalent in the ECOG cohort (27% v 18%, p<0.001). However, the incidence of t(9;22) increased with age and ECOG patients were significantly older. Overall, the 5 year event free survival (EFS) was 32% (95% CI 30%–35%) with a median follow-up time of 5.1 years and did not differ between the two cohorts. The EFS of t(9;22) patients [15% (11%–21%)] was significantly inferior compared with all other cases [36% (32%–39%)] (p<0.001) and was independent of age and white cell count (WCC). Univariate logrank analyses identified t(4;11) and high hyperdiploidy as indicators of poor and good prognosis, respectively, compared with other Ph negative cases, but neither was independent of age and WCC. Three subgroups were shown to have a significantly worse EFS compared to other Ph negative cases by logrank analyses after adjusting for age and WCC: t(8;14) 14% (2%–37%) v 36% (32%–40%) (p=0.01); low hypodiploidy 22% (8%–40%) v 36% (32%–40%) (p=0.02); complex karyotype 21% (10%–33%) v 32% (29%–35%) (p=0.005). Neither of the latter two subgroups were associated with other poor risk features such as age, WCC or failure to achieve a remission within 4 weeks.
Conclusions: This is the largest cytogenetic dataset of adult ALL reported to date and demonstrates the importance of combining cohorts to increase the number of cases available for analysis. The observation that low hypodiploidy and, for the first time, karyotype complexity confer a poor risk, demonstrates that cytogenetic subgroups other than the Ph translocation can and should be used to risk stratify adults with ALL to alternative treatments.
time, oncology-group, trial, patient, karyotype
0006-4971
p.100A
Moorman, Anthony V.
e4ced178-ee03-47ef-bc5e-25d8453951d5
Harrison, Christine J.
52da7673-509c-4b88-b92e-0c021c9c7d3e
Richards, Sue M.
d3a46ce3-0633-4781-812e-fa9faa77cad5
Fielding, Adele
a33b66f7-adbd-4d14-8ec5-848d04705df7
Tallman, Martin S.
5a2500de-0a3e-4983-8ee7-79a30c6af321
Litzow, Mark R.
b45af1f1-4146-4a27-afd2-ba4f52a4855d
Rowe, Jacob M.
cb697f55-f986-4354-b3d5-d22516481455
Goldstone, Anthony H.
8ce52bfc-d857-4592-97a3-79525672b39d
Dewald, Gordon W.
0d096653-a2d5-4357-bc59-f5e110ba00e5
Moorman, Anthony V.
e4ced178-ee03-47ef-bc5e-25d8453951d5
Harrison, Christine J.
52da7673-509c-4b88-b92e-0c021c9c7d3e
Richards, Sue M.
d3a46ce3-0633-4781-812e-fa9faa77cad5
Fielding, Adele
a33b66f7-adbd-4d14-8ec5-848d04705df7
Tallman, Martin S.
5a2500de-0a3e-4983-8ee7-79a30c6af321
Litzow, Mark R.
b45af1f1-4146-4a27-afd2-ba4f52a4855d
Rowe, Jacob M.
cb697f55-f986-4354-b3d5-d22516481455
Goldstone, Anthony H.
8ce52bfc-d857-4592-97a3-79525672b39d
Dewald, Gordon W.
0d096653-a2d5-4357-bc59-f5e110ba00e5

Moorman, Anthony V., Harrison, Christine J., Richards, Sue M., Fielding, Adele, Tallman, Martin S., Litzow, Mark R., Rowe, Jacob M., Goldstone, Anthony H. and Dewald, Gordon W. (2005) Karyotype is an independent prognostic factor in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): analysis of cytogenetic data from 1,235 patients on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial. Blood, 106 (11), p.100A.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Pre-treatment cytogenetics is a known predictor of outcome in haematological malignancies. However, its value in adult ALL is generally limited to the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) translocation; mostly due to the low incidence of other recurrent chromosomal abnormalities.
Methods: Since 1993, cytogenetic data from patients enrolled on a joint MRC/ECOG trial have been collated and reviewed centrally in the UK and US. Karyotype data from patients registered before the Imatinib amendment were pooled using standard cytogenetic definitions and classification criteria.
Results: A successful cytogenetic result was achieved in 938/1235 (76%) cases; while 297 (24%) failed with <20 normal metaphases analyzed. Patients were classified into the following mutually exclusive groups: t(9;22)(q34;q11) n=193(21%); t(4;11)(q21;q23) n=50(5%); other MLL translocations n=11(1%), t(8;14)(q24;q32) and variants n=14(1%); t(1;19)(q23;p13) n=23(2%); T cell receptor translocations n=35(4%); low hypodiploidy (30–39 chromosomes) /near triploidy n=23(2%); high hyperdiploidy n=83(9%); tetraploidy n=12(1%); complex karyotype (>=5 aberrations) n=48(5%); other abnormal n=255(27%); normal n=191(20%). MRC and ECOG patients showed similar cytogenetic distributions, except for t(9;22), which was significantly more prevalent in the ECOG cohort (27% v 18%, p<0.001). However, the incidence of t(9;22) increased with age and ECOG patients were significantly older. Overall, the 5 year event free survival (EFS) was 32% (95% CI 30%–35%) with a median follow-up time of 5.1 years and did not differ between the two cohorts. The EFS of t(9;22) patients [15% (11%–21%)] was significantly inferior compared with all other cases [36% (32%–39%)] (p<0.001) and was independent of age and white cell count (WCC). Univariate logrank analyses identified t(4;11) and high hyperdiploidy as indicators of poor and good prognosis, respectively, compared with other Ph negative cases, but neither was independent of age and WCC. Three subgroups were shown to have a significantly worse EFS compared to other Ph negative cases by logrank analyses after adjusting for age and WCC: t(8;14) 14% (2%–37%) v 36% (32%–40%) (p=0.01); low hypodiploidy 22% (8%–40%) v 36% (32%–40%) (p=0.02); complex karyotype 21% (10%–33%) v 32% (29%–35%) (p=0.005). Neither of the latter two subgroups were associated with other poor risk features such as age, WCC or failure to achieve a remission within 4 weeks.
Conclusions: This is the largest cytogenetic dataset of adult ALL reported to date and demonstrates the importance of combining cohorts to increase the number of cases available for analysis. The observation that low hypodiploidy and, for the first time, karyotype complexity confer a poor risk, demonstrates that cytogenetic subgroups other than the Ph translocation can and should be used to risk stratify adults with ALL to alternative treatments.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 16 November 2005
Additional Information: ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, Oral Sessions. Abstract 331.
Keywords: time, oncology-group, trial, patient, karyotype

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 62856
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62856
ISSN: 0006-4971
PURE UUID: 33b471f4-324a-420c-b88b-9054ea6245b1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Nov 2008
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 21:17

Export record

Contributors

Author: Anthony V. Moorman
Author: Christine J. Harrison
Author: Sue M. Richards
Author: Adele Fielding
Author: Martin S. Tallman
Author: Mark R. Litzow
Author: Jacob M. Rowe
Author: Anthony H. Goldstone
Author: Gordon W. Dewald

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×