Forgotten but not gone: the recall and recognition of self-threatening memories
Forgotten but not gone: the recall and recognition of self-threatening memories
When people selectively forget feedback that threatens the self (mnemic neglect), are those memories permanently lost or potentially recoverable? In two experiments, participants processed feedback pertaining either to themselves or to another person. Feedback consisted of a mixture of positive and negative behaviors exemplifying traits that were both central and peripheral to participants’ self-definition. In Experiment 1, participants exhibited poorer recall for, but unimpaired recognition of, self-threatening feedback (i.e., negative, central, self-referent), relative to both self-affirming feedback (positive, central, self-referent) and other-relevant feedback (positive/negative, central, other-referent). In Experiment 2, participants who had experienced ego-deflation, but not ego-inflation, exhibited mnemic neglect for recall, but not for recognition. Both experiments imply that, even after being self-protectively neglected, self-threatening memories can still be retrieved.
self-protection, recall, recognition, repression, feedback, neglect, inhibition, retrieval
547-561
Green, Jeffrey D.
4dc0383d-8061-41f3-a5d3-e12be4e54075
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gregg, Aiden P.
1b03bb58-b3a5-4852-a177-29e4f633b063
Green, Jeffrey D.
4dc0383d-8061-41f3-a5d3-e12be4e54075
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gregg, Aiden P.
1b03bb58-b3a5-4852-a177-29e4f633b063
Green, Jeffrey D., Sedikides, Constantine and Gregg, Aiden P.
(2007)
Forgotten but not gone: the recall and recognition of self-threatening memories.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (3), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.006).
(Submitted)
Abstract
When people selectively forget feedback that threatens the self (mnemic neglect), are those memories permanently lost or potentially recoverable? In two experiments, participants processed feedback pertaining either to themselves or to another person. Feedback consisted of a mixture of positive and negative behaviors exemplifying traits that were both central and peripheral to participants’ self-definition. In Experiment 1, participants exhibited poorer recall for, but unimpaired recognition of, self-threatening feedback (i.e., negative, central, self-referent), relative to both self-affirming feedback (positive, central, self-referent) and other-relevant feedback (positive/negative, central, other-referent). In Experiment 2, participants who had experienced ego-deflation, but not ego-inflation, exhibited mnemic neglect for recall, but not for recognition. Both experiments imply that, even after being self-protectively neglected, self-threatening memories can still be retrieved.
Text
unpubGreen_Sedikides_Gregg_2008.pdf
- Other
More information
Submitted date: September 2007
Keywords:
self-protection, recall, recognition, repression, feedback, neglect, inhibition, retrieval
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 63104
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63104
ISSN: 0022-1031
PURE UUID: 49b7c586-dcba-41eb-b3c3-e3c63fe69644
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Sep 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jeffrey D. Green
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics