The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Scales of biodiversity in abyssal benthic polychaetes (abstract presented at the Sixth International Polychaete Conference)

Scales of biodiversity in abyssal benthic polychaetes (abstract presented at the Sixth International Polychaete Conference)
Scales of biodiversity in abyssal benthic polychaetes (abstract presented at the Sixth International Polychaete Conference)
As part of an European Union Marine Science and Technology (MAST) initiative, polychaete assemblages were studied from the Madeiran Abyssal Plain (MAP). Three other sites from the northeast Atlantic were used for comparative purposes. The sites lie under a gradient of surface productivity from a seasonal high productivity site on the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (PAP) to an oligotrophic non-seasonal site on the Cap Verde Abyssal Plain (EUMELI). Two sites of intermediate productivity were on the Tagus Abyssal Plain (TAP) and MAP. Data was analyzed to determine abundance, distribution within sediment, diversity and faunal similarity of MAP with the other three sites. MAP was show to have reduced abundance (approx. 250 ind m?2) and diversity compared to the other three sites. It is not apparent why MAP should show low polychaete abundance as it lies under a higher surface productivity regime than EUMELI. One possible explanation comes from a biogeochemical analysis which suggests that a turbidity current has passed through in the last 1000 yrs, re-working the sediment. Within sediment distribution of polychaetes at MAP revealed penetration of the 0–5 cm layer, similar to PAP and unlike the superficial distribution recorded form the oligotrophic EUMELI site. Analysis of beta diversity at MAP does not lend support to the idea of a latitudinal diversity gradient, being lower than both northerly and southerly sites. Surface and sub-surface deposit- feeding cirratulids, spionids and paraonids dominate the fauna. A dominant predator, Sigambra sp., was abundant in three of the sites. At the species level, faunal similarity was low, in the region of 15–20% between-site and 30–50% within-site. It appears that although similar in terms of functional groups, the sites are quite separate in terms of species composition, supporting the hypothesis that the abyss is not populated by one uniform species pool. Detailed taxonomic work on the more abundant “cosmopolitan” species is required to verify biogeographical distributions
p.664
Glover, A.
31dd7ea2-17b9-47c4-866f-4be9b9a4a991
Paterson, G.L.J.
a08361d0-a82a-4012-a8e9-85a0bcd1af9d
Gage, J.D.
05b32e98-9bc2-4110-bec7-1d815c85c7b0
Hawkins, L.
9c4d1845-82db-4305-acb5-31b218ac9c0e
Sheader, M.
fc6fc729-69bd-460d-846f-e2ba1c8e1b6b
Bett, B.J.
61342990-13be-45ae-9f5c-9540114335d9
Glover, A.
31dd7ea2-17b9-47c4-866f-4be9b9a4a991
Paterson, G.L.J.
a08361d0-a82a-4012-a8e9-85a0bcd1af9d
Gage, J.D.
05b32e98-9bc2-4110-bec7-1d815c85c7b0
Hawkins, L.
9c4d1845-82db-4305-acb5-31b218ac9c0e
Sheader, M.
fc6fc729-69bd-460d-846f-e2ba1c8e1b6b
Bett, B.J.
61342990-13be-45ae-9f5c-9540114335d9

Glover, A., Paterson, G.L.J., Gage, J.D., Hawkins, L., Sheader, M. and Bett, B.J. (2000) Scales of biodiversity in abyssal benthic polychaetes (abstract presented at the Sixth International Polychaete Conference). Bulletin of Marine Science, 67 (1), p.664.

Record type: Article

Abstract

As part of an European Union Marine Science and Technology (MAST) initiative, polychaete assemblages were studied from the Madeiran Abyssal Plain (MAP). Three other sites from the northeast Atlantic were used for comparative purposes. The sites lie under a gradient of surface productivity from a seasonal high productivity site on the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (PAP) to an oligotrophic non-seasonal site on the Cap Verde Abyssal Plain (EUMELI). Two sites of intermediate productivity were on the Tagus Abyssal Plain (TAP) and MAP. Data was analyzed to determine abundance, distribution within sediment, diversity and faunal similarity of MAP with the other three sites. MAP was show to have reduced abundance (approx. 250 ind m?2) and diversity compared to the other three sites. It is not apparent why MAP should show low polychaete abundance as it lies under a higher surface productivity regime than EUMELI. One possible explanation comes from a biogeochemical analysis which suggests that a turbidity current has passed through in the last 1000 yrs, re-working the sediment. Within sediment distribution of polychaetes at MAP revealed penetration of the 0–5 cm layer, similar to PAP and unlike the superficial distribution recorded form the oligotrophic EUMELI site. Analysis of beta diversity at MAP does not lend support to the idea of a latitudinal diversity gradient, being lower than both northerly and southerly sites. Surface and sub-surface deposit- feeding cirratulids, spionids and paraonids dominate the fauna. A dominant predator, Sigambra sp., was abundant in three of the sites. At the species level, faunal similarity was low, in the region of 15–20% between-site and 30–50% within-site. It appears that although similar in terms of functional groups, the sites are quite separate in terms of species composition, supporting the hypothesis that the abyss is not populated by one uniform species pool. Detailed taxonomic work on the more abundant “cosmopolitan” species is required to verify biogeographical distributions

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: July 2000

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 63280
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63280
PURE UUID: aa9b9ea5-3004-4a8c-9421-bc89981dbc86
ORCID for L. Hawkins: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9236-2396

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Sep 2008
Last modified: 14 Mar 2019 01:55

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×