The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The effects of aromatherapy oil on the behaviour of stabled horses.

The effects of aromatherapy oil on the behaviour of stabled horses.
The effects of aromatherapy oil on the behaviour of stabled horses.
These two replicated trials investigated the behavioural effects of aromatherapy oils on 12 stabled horses, divided into three groups according to stable design. In trial 1, 12 aromatherapy oils were separately presented as drops of oil on wooden blocks. Behaviour was videoed and the mean duration of olfactory investigation of the blocks used to construct a mean attractiveness order for the 12 oils. The three most attractive oils, Rose (Rosadamascena), Roman Chamomile (Anthemis nobilis) and Peppermint (Mentha piperita) were used in trial 2. In trial 2, these three oils and Sunflower oil as a control, were each presented individually for five days. On days 1, 3 and 5 behaviour was recorded for 30 minutes using wall-mounted video cameras. Data was harvested from tapes according to a nine mutually exclusive behaviour ethogram using the Observer v.5 package and analysed using SPSS v.12. Freidman's analysis showed a significant effect of treatment on duration of movement (P<0.05, df 3, 2 9.92) and standing alert (P<0.05, df 3, 2 9.01), while differences in dozing behaviour approached significance (P<0.1, df 3, 2 6.36). Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Tests for treatment differences found that Rose (P<0.05, Z -3.242) and Roman Chamomile (P<0.05, Z-2.462) resulted in a significant reduction in movement behaviours. Differences between Peppermint and the control were not significant. Using Freidman's analysis a significant difference was found between the three groups in mean duration of behaviours (P<0.005, df2, 2 11.31), suggesting that stable design influences equine behavioural responses to aromatherapy oils. In these short-term trials the horses demonstrated increased attraction to Peppermint, Rose and Roman Chamomile aromatherapy oils. Rose and Roman Chamomile oils resulted in behaviour suggesting increased relaxation. Published studies have shown the stimulating effects of Peppermint oil on dogs, however this study did not demonstrate similar effects in horses.
p.149
ISAE Scientific Committee 2006 for the Organising Committee of the 40th ISAE Congress
Glover, Christine
606ac9be-532c-4fec-8a01-b9f45ab9bd3f
Goodwin, Deborah
6a44fe30-189a-493d-8dcc-3eb8199a12ab
Mendl, M.
Burman, O.H.P.
Butterworth, A.
Harris, M.J.
Held, S.D.E.
Jones, S.M.
Littin, K.E.
Main, D.C.J.
Nicol, C.J.
Parker, R.M.A.
Paul, E.S.
Richards, G.
Sherwin, C.M.
Statham, P.T.E
Toscano, M.J.
Warriss, P.D
Glover, Christine
606ac9be-532c-4fec-8a01-b9f45ab9bd3f
Goodwin, Deborah
6a44fe30-189a-493d-8dcc-3eb8199a12ab
Mendl, M.
Burman, O.H.P.
Butterworth, A.
Harris, M.J.
Held, S.D.E.
Jones, S.M.
Littin, K.E.
Main, D.C.J.
Nicol, C.J.
Parker, R.M.A.
Paul, E.S.
Richards, G.
Sherwin, C.M.
Statham, P.T.E
Toscano, M.J.
Warriss, P.D

Glover, Christine and Goodwin, Deborah (2006) The effects of aromatherapy oil on the behaviour of stabled horses. Mendl, M., Burman, O.H.P., Butterworth, A., Harris, M.J., Held, S.D.E., Jones, S.M., Littin, K.E., Main, D.C.J., Nicol, C.J., Parker, R.M.A., Paul, E.S., Richards, G., Sherwin, C.M., Statham, P.T.E, Toscano, M.J. and Warriss, P.D (eds.) In Proceedings of the 40th International Congress of ISAE. ISAE Scientific Committee 2006 for the Organising Committee of the 40th ISAE Congress. p.149 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

These two replicated trials investigated the behavioural effects of aromatherapy oils on 12 stabled horses, divided into three groups according to stable design. In trial 1, 12 aromatherapy oils were separately presented as drops of oil on wooden blocks. Behaviour was videoed and the mean duration of olfactory investigation of the blocks used to construct a mean attractiveness order for the 12 oils. The three most attractive oils, Rose (Rosadamascena), Roman Chamomile (Anthemis nobilis) and Peppermint (Mentha piperita) were used in trial 2. In trial 2, these three oils and Sunflower oil as a control, were each presented individually for five days. On days 1, 3 and 5 behaviour was recorded for 30 minutes using wall-mounted video cameras. Data was harvested from tapes according to a nine mutually exclusive behaviour ethogram using the Observer v.5 package and analysed using SPSS v.12. Freidman's analysis showed a significant effect of treatment on duration of movement (P<0.05, df 3, 2 9.92) and standing alert (P<0.05, df 3, 2 9.01), while differences in dozing behaviour approached significance (P<0.1, df 3, 2 6.36). Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Tests for treatment differences found that Rose (P<0.05, Z -3.242) and Roman Chamomile (P<0.05, Z-2.462) resulted in a significant reduction in movement behaviours. Differences between Peppermint and the control were not significant. Using Freidman's analysis a significant difference was found between the three groups in mean duration of behaviours (P<0.005, df2, 2 11.31), suggesting that stable design influences equine behavioural responses to aromatherapy oils. In these short-term trials the horses demonstrated increased attraction to Peppermint, Rose and Roman Chamomile aromatherapy oils. Rose and Roman Chamomile oils resulted in behaviour suggesting increased relaxation. Published studies have shown the stimulating effects of Peppermint oil on dogs, however this study did not demonstrate similar effects in horses.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 20 July 2006
Venue - Dates: 40th International Congress of ISAE, Bristol, UK, 2006-08-07 - 2006-08-11

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 63492
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63492
PURE UUID: e16cbe6d-5d5b-437d-9bf2-c972b227ad41

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Oct 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 18:14

Export record

Contributors

Author: Christine Glover
Author: Deborah Goodwin
Editor: M. Mendl
Editor: O.H.P. Burman
Editor: A. Butterworth
Editor: M.J. Harris
Editor: S.D.E. Held
Editor: S.M. Jones
Editor: K.E. Littin
Editor: D.C.J. Main
Editor: C.J. Nicol
Editor: R.M.A. Parker
Editor: E.S. Paul
Editor: G. Richards
Editor: C.M. Sherwin
Editor: P.T.E Statham
Editor: M.J. Toscano
Editor: P.D Warriss

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×