The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Horsemanship: conventional, natural and equitation science

Horsemanship: conventional, natural and equitation science
Horsemanship: conventional, natural and equitation science
Many cultures have trained horses using conventional approaches and acknowledged a talent for working with horses as natural horsemanship. The current popularity of “Natural Horsemanship” has prompted change in the equestrian industry. These changes extend from individuals to conventional training organizations. Academic ethologists were interested in these developments, but expressed concern at the way some Natural Horsemanship trainers presented “Equine Ethology”. Often personal opinions were claimed as facts, without any associated objective study of horse behaviour in the natural or domestic environment. Good Natural Horsemanship trainers are talented observers of horse behaviour and respond precisely to subtle cues during training. They have demonstrated their ability to utilize the marketplace and teach their methods for commercial reward. Unfortunately, not all followers of these methods are as effective as the originating trainers. Poor technique can lead to disappointing result, frustration and reduced safety in practitioners, and result in abuse, confusion and conflict behavior in horses. The success of Natural Horsemanship trainers encouraged scientists studying horse behaviour and training to be more active in communicating their work to horse owners and trainers. Science has much to offer in advancing techniques in horse training and reducing wastage by objectively assessing what does and does not work, and most importantly, why? Calibrated rein tension gauges and pressure sensitive pads can measure the strength and frequency of rider’s signals to the horse. Riders and trainers can integrate technology into their training methods to measure contact and lightness objectively. Assessment of welfare and performance is increasingly possible via a range of physiological and behavioural measures. Equitation scientists, conventional and Natural Horsemanship trainers aim to help people train horses more effectively. It is critical that we share our knowledge to achieve these goals because, when training fails, horses suffer and may pay the ultimate price with their lives.
p.51
International Society for Equitation Science
Goodwin, Deborah
6a44fe30-189a-493d-8dcc-3eb8199a12ab
McGreevy, Paul
dd4be87a-9414-41b7-909e-90b8931f4459
Waran, Natalie
45cc3b0a-2522-41d9-ba57-0a4175f90107
McClean, Andrew
6ee10258-52a3-4265-87fe-6ba06cef3598
Murphy, Jack
Hennessy, Karen
Wall, Patrick
Hanly, Pat
Goodwin, Deborah
6a44fe30-189a-493d-8dcc-3eb8199a12ab
McGreevy, Paul
dd4be87a-9414-41b7-909e-90b8931f4459
Waran, Natalie
45cc3b0a-2522-41d9-ba57-0a4175f90107
McClean, Andrew
6ee10258-52a3-4265-87fe-6ba06cef3598
Murphy, Jack
Hennessy, Karen
Wall, Patrick
Hanly, Pat

Goodwin, Deborah, McGreevy, Paul, Waran, Natalie and McClean, Andrew (2008) Horsemanship: conventional, natural and equitation science. Murphy, Jack, Hennessy, Karen, Wall, Patrick and Hanly, Pat (eds.) In Conference Proceedings: ISES Dublin 2008. International Society for Equitation Science: 4th International Conference. International Society for Equitation Science. p.51 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Many cultures have trained horses using conventional approaches and acknowledged a talent for working with horses as natural horsemanship. The current popularity of “Natural Horsemanship” has prompted change in the equestrian industry. These changes extend from individuals to conventional training organizations. Academic ethologists were interested in these developments, but expressed concern at the way some Natural Horsemanship trainers presented “Equine Ethology”. Often personal opinions were claimed as facts, without any associated objective study of horse behaviour in the natural or domestic environment. Good Natural Horsemanship trainers are talented observers of horse behaviour and respond precisely to subtle cues during training. They have demonstrated their ability to utilize the marketplace and teach their methods for commercial reward. Unfortunately, not all followers of these methods are as effective as the originating trainers. Poor technique can lead to disappointing result, frustration and reduced safety in practitioners, and result in abuse, confusion and conflict behavior in horses. The success of Natural Horsemanship trainers encouraged scientists studying horse behaviour and training to be more active in communicating their work to horse owners and trainers. Science has much to offer in advancing techniques in horse training and reducing wastage by objectively assessing what does and does not work, and most importantly, why? Calibrated rein tension gauges and pressure sensitive pads can measure the strength and frequency of rider’s signals to the horse. Riders and trainers can integrate technology into their training methods to measure contact and lightness objectively. Assessment of welfare and performance is increasingly possible via a range of physiological and behavioural measures. Equitation scientists, conventional and Natural Horsemanship trainers aim to help people train horses more effectively. It is critical that we share our knowledge to achieve these goals because, when training fails, horses suffer and may pay the ultimate price with their lives.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2008
Venue - Dates: ISES Dublin 2008. International Society for Equitation Science: 4th International Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 2008-08-01 - 2008-08-04

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 63512
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63512
PURE UUID: 4cc6f7bf-9c64-4d48-a9bf-ff585191b569

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Oct 2008
Last modified: 07 Mar 2024 18:00

Export record

Contributors

Author: Deborah Goodwin
Author: Paul McGreevy
Author: Natalie Waran
Author: Andrew McClean
Editor: Jack Murphy
Editor: Karen Hennessy
Editor: Patrick Wall
Editor: Pat Hanly

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×