The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Behaviour of stabled horses presented with foraging devices in mangers and buckets

Behaviour of stabled horses presented with foraging devices in mangers and buckets
Behaviour of stabled horses presented with foraging devices in mangers and buckets
Processed feed for stabled horses is usually presented in buckets or mangers, and is easily and rapidly consumed. Foraging devices based on the Edinburgh Foodball can be used to provide part of the ration. Current designs are all placed on the floor, raising concerns about ingestion of foreign materials with the dispensed food. Alternative devices were evaluated, used within suitable, clean containers to prolong food-handling times but avoid such issues. In four Latin Square designed replicated trials we investigated behaviour of 12 stabled horses with three foraging devices. These were separately presented for five minutes, varied in sensory complexity (Round, Square, Polyhedral) and contained 500g high fibre pellets. In Trials I and II six geldings were presented with devices in buckets then mangers. All individuals foraged successfully from at least one of the devices and behaviour was compared. However, all individuals exhibited some frustration while using the devices (either pawing or biting them). Horses frequently removed the devices from the buckets in Trial I terminating these sessions. In Trial II mean device foraging duration was ranked Polyhedral>Round>Square. Mean pawing rate in Trial II was calculated for horses (frequency of pawing per individual/summed duration manipulation and foraging) and was highest with Square (0.11, npawers=6). In Trial III six stabled mares were presented with the same foraging devices in mangers. Mean foraging duration with devices again ranked Polyhedral>Round>Square. Mean pawing rate was highest with Device round (0.08, npawers=4). Trial IV investigated behaviour of six horses when devices initially containing five high fibre pellets became empty. Mean foraging duration with devices again ranked Polyhedral>Round>Square. Mean pawing rate was highest with Square (0.05, npawers=3). Device polyhedral had highest mean duration of foraging in all Trials. Devices met objective but unpredictability of pellet rewarding stimulus may indicate a source of frustration and warrants further investigation.
horse, domestic, foraging devices, foraging behaviour, enrichment
p.96
ISAE2005
Goodwin, Deborah
6a44fe30-189a-493d-8dcc-3eb8199a12ab
Harris, Pat
c5c0081f-0085-49cb-8993-6ae92ccbb6b2
Davidson, Nell
49dad694-d86d-406a-a9b2-11e81e04d38d
Kusonose, Ryo
Shusuke, Sato
Goodwin, Deborah
6a44fe30-189a-493d-8dcc-3eb8199a12ab
Harris, Pat
c5c0081f-0085-49cb-8993-6ae92ccbb6b2
Davidson, Nell
49dad694-d86d-406a-a9b2-11e81e04d38d
Kusonose, Ryo
Shusuke, Sato

Goodwin, Deborah, Harris, Pat and Davidson, Nell (2005) Behaviour of stabled horses presented with foraging devices in mangers and buckets. Kusonose, Ryo and Shusuke, Sato (eds.) In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference of the International Society for Applied Ethology. ISAE2005. p.96 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Processed feed for stabled horses is usually presented in buckets or mangers, and is easily and rapidly consumed. Foraging devices based on the Edinburgh Foodball can be used to provide part of the ration. Current designs are all placed on the floor, raising concerns about ingestion of foreign materials with the dispensed food. Alternative devices were evaluated, used within suitable, clean containers to prolong food-handling times but avoid such issues. In four Latin Square designed replicated trials we investigated behaviour of 12 stabled horses with three foraging devices. These were separately presented for five minutes, varied in sensory complexity (Round, Square, Polyhedral) and contained 500g high fibre pellets. In Trials I and II six geldings were presented with devices in buckets then mangers. All individuals foraged successfully from at least one of the devices and behaviour was compared. However, all individuals exhibited some frustration while using the devices (either pawing or biting them). Horses frequently removed the devices from the buckets in Trial I terminating these sessions. In Trial II mean device foraging duration was ranked Polyhedral>Round>Square. Mean pawing rate in Trial II was calculated for horses (frequency of pawing per individual/summed duration manipulation and foraging) and was highest with Square (0.11, npawers=6). In Trial III six stabled mares were presented with the same foraging devices in mangers. Mean foraging duration with devices again ranked Polyhedral>Round>Square. Mean pawing rate was highest with Device round (0.08, npawers=4). Trial IV investigated behaviour of six horses when devices initially containing five high fibre pellets became empty. Mean foraging duration with devices again ranked Polyhedral>Round>Square. Mean pawing rate was highest with Square (0.05, npawers=3). Device polyhedral had highest mean duration of foraging in all Trials. Devices met objective but unpredictability of pellet rewarding stimulus may indicate a source of frustration and warrants further investigation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2005
Venue - Dates: 39th International Conference of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Azabu, Japan, 2005-08-19 - 2005-08-23
Keywords: horse, domestic, foraging devices, foraging behaviour, enrichment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 63518
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63518
PURE UUID: a07dd4fc-5519-4ad4-85a3-0234f401c72e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Oct 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 18:15

Export record

Contributors

Author: Deborah Goodwin
Author: Pat Harris
Author: Nell Davidson
Editor: Ryo Kusonose
Editor: Sato Shusuke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×