The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The selection of enriched versus restricted forage environments by stabled horses.

The selection of enriched versus restricted forage environments by stabled horses.
The selection of enriched versus restricted forage environments by stabled horses.
Many stabled horses are maintained in very different conditions from those in whichthey evolved. The diet of feral horses includes many grasses and browse species, however, most stabled horses are given a single forage. In four replicated trials, twelve competition horses were introduced into each of two identical stables containing a single forage, or six forages for five minutes. To detect novelty effects, in the first and third trials the single forage was hay. In the second and fourth it was the preferred forage from the preceding trial. Trials were videotaped and 13 mutually exclusive behaviour patterns compared. After these sessions horses were allowed five minutes to choose between stables and duration in each compared. Data were evaluated using Observer 3 and SPSS v8. Square root transformations normalised the data allowing GLM factorial ANOVA. Similar results were obtained from all trials, and some effects of monotony were detected. Hay was the least preferred forage throughout. Behaviour was significantly different between stables in all trials, e.g.; during the third trial in the single forage stable horses looked over the stable door more frequently (F1,11=65.9; p=0.001), moved for longer (F1,11=161.6; p=0.001), foraged on straw bedding longer (F1,11=35.9; p=0.001), and exhibited behaviour indicative of frustration (F1,11=8.5; p=0.014) more frequently. When allowed to choose, horses spent more time in the Multiple forage stable (arcsine transformed proportional data, t-test: t=19.8; DF=10; p=0.001). In these trials behaviour in stables with single or multiple forages was significantly different. When allowed to choose, horses showed a preference for the multiple forage environment. Further study is required to determine whether these effects persist over longer periods. However, these trials indicate that enrichment of the stable environment through the provision of multiple forages may have welfare benefits for domestic horses, in reducing straw consumption and behaviour indicative of frustration.
p.117
Center For Animal Welfare at UC Davis
Goodwin, D.
44ea5b5f-3933-4171-83b6-8d48928e27ca
Davidson, H.R.B.
3ed73074-ed7a-4728-b310-a4dec797cf5e
Harris, P.A.
9eef118a-69fe-4108-a94e-547cd0bc975b
Garner, J.P.
Mench, J.A.
Heekin, S.P.
Goodwin, D.
44ea5b5f-3933-4171-83b6-8d48928e27ca
Davidson, H.R.B.
3ed73074-ed7a-4728-b310-a4dec797cf5e
Harris, P.A.
9eef118a-69fe-4108-a94e-547cd0bc975b
Garner, J.P.
Mench, J.A.
Heekin, S.P.

Goodwin, D., Davidson, H.R.B. and Harris, P.A. (2001) The selection of enriched versus restricted forage environments by stabled horses. Garner, J.P., Mench, J.A. and Heekin, S.P. (eds.) In Proceedings of the 35th International Congress of the ISAE. Center For Animal Welfare at UC Davis. p.117 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Many stabled horses are maintained in very different conditions from those in whichthey evolved. The diet of feral horses includes many grasses and browse species, however, most stabled horses are given a single forage. In four replicated trials, twelve competition horses were introduced into each of two identical stables containing a single forage, or six forages for five minutes. To detect novelty effects, in the first and third trials the single forage was hay. In the second and fourth it was the preferred forage from the preceding trial. Trials were videotaped and 13 mutually exclusive behaviour patterns compared. After these sessions horses were allowed five minutes to choose between stables and duration in each compared. Data were evaluated using Observer 3 and SPSS v8. Square root transformations normalised the data allowing GLM factorial ANOVA. Similar results were obtained from all trials, and some effects of monotony were detected. Hay was the least preferred forage throughout. Behaviour was significantly different between stables in all trials, e.g.; during the third trial in the single forage stable horses looked over the stable door more frequently (F1,11=65.9; p=0.001), moved for longer (F1,11=161.6; p=0.001), foraged on straw bedding longer (F1,11=35.9; p=0.001), and exhibited behaviour indicative of frustration (F1,11=8.5; p=0.014) more frequently. When allowed to choose, horses spent more time in the Multiple forage stable (arcsine transformed proportional data, t-test: t=19.8; DF=10; p=0.001). In these trials behaviour in stables with single or multiple forages was significantly different. When allowed to choose, horses showed a preference for the multiple forage environment. Further study is required to determine whether these effects persist over longer periods. However, these trials indicate that enrichment of the stable environment through the provision of multiple forages may have welfare benefits for domestic horses, in reducing straw consumption and behaviour indicative of frustration.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2001
Venue - Dates: 35th International Congress of the ISAE, Davis, California, 2001-08-03 - 2001-08-07

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 63522
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63522
PURE UUID: 58907fb7-596f-4d15-b338-5603a3d4d2e1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Oct 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 18:15

Export record

Contributors

Author: D. Goodwin
Author: H.R.B. Davidson
Author: P.A. Harris
Editor: J.P. Garner
Editor: J.A. Mench
Editor: S.P. Heekin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×