The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Recency and primacy in causal judgements: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction

Recency and primacy in causal judgements: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction
Recency and primacy in causal judgements: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction
Traditional associative models assume that associative weights are updated on a trial-by-trial basis. As a result, it is usually expected that responses based on these weights will tend to reflect the most recently presented contingencies. However, a number of studies of human causal judgments have shown primacy effects, wherein judgments obtained at the end of a series of trials are more strongly influenced by a contingency that was in force early in the sequence than by a contingency that was in force later in the sequence. The experiments described in this article replicated other work showing that requesting causal judgments during a sequence can reverse primacy and produce strong recency effects. Evidence was also obtained to suggest that primacy effects are produced by an interaction between latent inhibition and extinction processes and that requesting a judgment affects both of these processes.
0090-502X
1087-1093
Glautier, Steven
964468b2-3ad7-40cc-b4be-e35c7dee518f
Glautier, Steven
964468b2-3ad7-40cc-b4be-e35c7dee518f

Glautier, Steven (2008) Recency and primacy in causal judgements: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction. Memory & Cognition, 36 (6), 1087-1093. (doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1087).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Traditional associative models assume that associative weights are updated on a trial-by-trial basis. As a result, it is usually expected that responses based on these weights will tend to reflect the most recently presented contingencies. However, a number of studies of human causal judgments have shown primacy effects, wherein judgments obtained at the end of a series of trials are more strongly influenced by a contingency that was in force early in the sequence than by a contingency that was in force later in the sequence. The experiments described in this article replicated other work showing that requesting causal judgments during a sequence can reverse primacy and produce strong recency effects. Evidence was also obtained to suggest that primacy effects are produced by an interaction between latent inhibition and extinction processes and that requesting a judgment affects both of these processes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 63958
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63958
ISSN: 0090-502X
PURE UUID: 1d138d9c-b383-40b9-a170-514727d33e5e
ORCID for Steven Glautier: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8852-3268

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Nov 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×