The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research
The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research
This article explores the ways in which social researchers manage issues of confidentiality and the contexts in which deliberate and accidental disclosures occur. The data are drawn from a qualitative study of social researchers' practices in relation to informed consent. It comprised 31 individual interviews and six focus groups as well as invited email responses with researchers working with vulnerable groups or with an interest in research ethics. Researchers reported feeling compelled to break confidentiality when participants were perceived as being at risk of harm but not in cases of involvement in illegal activity. Situations in which accidental disclosures occurred were also identified. Researchers reported varying ways in which they protected the confidentiality of their participants in the dissemination of their research, including omitting data and changing key characteristics of participants. The implications of researchers' practices on data integrity and relationships with participants are discussed.
417-428
Wiles, Rose
5bdc597b-716c-4f60-9f45-631ecca25571
Crow, Graham
723761e4-bba1-4eba-9672-e7029f547fce
Heath, Sue
f4df85b4-fdde-4353-8641-08a4b9fbbcae
Charles, Vikki
d0c792df-7763-43a0-a73b-1d9212243982
December 2008
Wiles, Rose
5bdc597b-716c-4f60-9f45-631ecca25571
Crow, Graham
723761e4-bba1-4eba-9672-e7029f547fce
Heath, Sue
f4df85b4-fdde-4353-8641-08a4b9fbbcae
Charles, Vikki
d0c792df-7763-43a0-a73b-1d9212243982
Wiles, Rose, Crow, Graham, Heath, Sue and Charles, Vikki
(2008)
The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11 (5), .
(doi:10.1080/13645570701622231).
Abstract
This article explores the ways in which social researchers manage issues of confidentiality and the contexts in which deliberate and accidental disclosures occur. The data are drawn from a qualitative study of social researchers' practices in relation to informed consent. It comprised 31 individual interviews and six focus groups as well as invited email responses with researchers working with vulnerable groups or with an interest in research ethics. Researchers reported feeling compelled to break confidentiality when participants were perceived as being at risk of harm but not in cases of involvement in illegal activity. Situations in which accidental disclosures occurred were also identified. Researchers reported varying ways in which they protected the confidentiality of their participants in the dissemination of their research, including omitting data and changing key characteristics of participants. The implications of researchers' practices on data integrity and relationships with participants are discussed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 November 2008
Published date: December 2008
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 64192
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/64192
ISSN: 1364-5579
PURE UUID: 08f54fe4-64e8-4945-ad39-cd7d44b35a8d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Jan 2009
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Rose Wiles
Author:
Graham Crow
Author:
Sue Heath
Author:
Vikki Charles
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics