The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mechanism of nonlinear biodynamic response of the human body exposed to whole-body vibration

Mechanism of nonlinear biodynamic response of the human body exposed to whole-body vibration
Mechanism of nonlinear biodynamic response of the human body exposed to whole-body vibration
When the human body is exposed to mechanical vibration, the resonance frequencies of the frequency response functions, such as apparent mass and transmissibility, decrease with increasing magnitude of excitation. For the past two decades, this biodynamic ‘nonlinearity’ has been reported with vertical and horizontal excitation of the body in a wide variety of static sitting and standing postures that require activity from muscles to maintain the stability of the body. There has been speculation, but no experimental evidence, as to the mechanism causing the non-linearity. A review of the literature suggested that either active muscular activity or passive thixotropy of soft tissues is the primary cause of the nonlinearity. The principal objective of this thesis is to identify, and provide experimental evidence of, the primary causal mechanism for the biodynamic nonlinearity. With 0.5 to 20 Hz broadband random vertical vibration at 0.25 and 2.0 ms-2 r.m.s., the first experiment investigated the effect of voluntary periodic upper-body movement and vibration magnitude on the apparent masses of 14 seated subjects. Some movements of the body, such as ‘back-abdomen bending’, significantly reduced the difference in resonance frequency at the two vibration magnitudes compared with the difference during upright static sitting. Without voluntary periodic movement, the median apparent mass resonance frequency was 5.47 Hz at the low vibration magnitude and 4.39 Hz at the high vibration magnitude. With voluntary periodic movement (e.g. back-abdomen bending), the resonance frequency was 4.69 Hz at the low vibration magnitude and 4.59 Hz at the high vibration magnitude. It was concluded that voluntary or involuntary muscular activity, or passive thixotropy of soft tissues, or both muscle activity and thixotropy, could explain the reduction in nonlinearity evident during voluntary periodic movement. The effect of shear history and vibration magnitude on the apparent mass was investigated using 12 subjects in a relaxed semi-supine posture assumed to involve less muscle activity than static sitting and standing. The semi-supine subjects were exposed to two types of vertical (in the x-axis of the semi-supine body) and longitudinal horizontal (z-axis) vibration: (i) continuous random vibration (0.25–20 Hz) at five magnitudes (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 ms-2 r.m.s.); (ii) intermittent random vibration (0.25–20 Hz) alternating between 1.0 and 0.25 ms-2 r.m.s. With continuous random vibration, the dominant primary resonance frequency in the median normalised apparent mass decreased from 10.35 to 7.32 Hz as the magnitude of vertical vibration increased from 0.125 to 1.0 ms-2 r.m.s., and from 3.66 to 2.44 Hz as the magnitude of horizontal vibration increased from 0.125 to 1.0 ms-2 r.m.s. With the intermittent vibration, the resonance frequency was higher at the higher magnitude (1.0 ms-2 r.m.s.) and lower at the lower magnitude (0.25 ms-2 r.m.s.) than during continuous vibration at the same magnitudes. The response was typical of thixotropy being the primary cause of the nonlinearity. Harmonic distortions in the dynamic force of semi-supine subjects exposed to sinusoidal excitation showed similar dependence on the frequency and magnitude of vibration as previously reported for seated subjects, again suggesting thixotropy as a primary cause of the nonlinearity. In a group of 12 subjects, the apparent mass and transmissibility to the sternum, upper abdomen, and lower abdomen were measured in three supine postures (relaxed semi-supine, lying flat, and constrained semi-supine) during vertical random vibration (0.25 to 20 Hz) at seven vibration magnitudes (nominally 0.0313, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 ms-2 r.m.s.). The motion transmission path that included more soft tissues exhibited a greater nonlinear response. The substantial nonlinearities found in transmissibilities to both the sternum and the abdomen of supine subjects, and previously reported for the transmissibilities of seated and standing subjects, imply that soft tissues at the excitation-subject interface contribute to the nonlinearity. It is concluded that the thixotropy of soft tissues, rather than voluntary or involuntary muscular activity, is the primary cause of the biodynamic nonlinearity seen with varying magnitudes of excitation.
Huang, Ya
51b3d770-2401-4213-9819-05ddd234cfe6
Huang, Ya
51b3d770-2401-4213-9819-05ddd234cfe6
Griffin, Michael
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8

Huang, Ya (2008) Mechanism of nonlinear biodynamic response of the human body exposed to whole-body vibration. University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Doctoral Thesis, 289pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

When the human body is exposed to mechanical vibration, the resonance frequencies of the frequency response functions, such as apparent mass and transmissibility, decrease with increasing magnitude of excitation. For the past two decades, this biodynamic ‘nonlinearity’ has been reported with vertical and horizontal excitation of the body in a wide variety of static sitting and standing postures that require activity from muscles to maintain the stability of the body. There has been speculation, but no experimental evidence, as to the mechanism causing the non-linearity. A review of the literature suggested that either active muscular activity or passive thixotropy of soft tissues is the primary cause of the nonlinearity. The principal objective of this thesis is to identify, and provide experimental evidence of, the primary causal mechanism for the biodynamic nonlinearity. With 0.5 to 20 Hz broadband random vertical vibration at 0.25 and 2.0 ms-2 r.m.s., the first experiment investigated the effect of voluntary periodic upper-body movement and vibration magnitude on the apparent masses of 14 seated subjects. Some movements of the body, such as ‘back-abdomen bending’, significantly reduced the difference in resonance frequency at the two vibration magnitudes compared with the difference during upright static sitting. Without voluntary periodic movement, the median apparent mass resonance frequency was 5.47 Hz at the low vibration magnitude and 4.39 Hz at the high vibration magnitude. With voluntary periodic movement (e.g. back-abdomen bending), the resonance frequency was 4.69 Hz at the low vibration magnitude and 4.59 Hz at the high vibration magnitude. It was concluded that voluntary or involuntary muscular activity, or passive thixotropy of soft tissues, or both muscle activity and thixotropy, could explain the reduction in nonlinearity evident during voluntary periodic movement. The effect of shear history and vibration magnitude on the apparent mass was investigated using 12 subjects in a relaxed semi-supine posture assumed to involve less muscle activity than static sitting and standing. The semi-supine subjects were exposed to two types of vertical (in the x-axis of the semi-supine body) and longitudinal horizontal (z-axis) vibration: (i) continuous random vibration (0.25–20 Hz) at five magnitudes (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 ms-2 r.m.s.); (ii) intermittent random vibration (0.25–20 Hz) alternating between 1.0 and 0.25 ms-2 r.m.s. With continuous random vibration, the dominant primary resonance frequency in the median normalised apparent mass decreased from 10.35 to 7.32 Hz as the magnitude of vertical vibration increased from 0.125 to 1.0 ms-2 r.m.s., and from 3.66 to 2.44 Hz as the magnitude of horizontal vibration increased from 0.125 to 1.0 ms-2 r.m.s. With the intermittent vibration, the resonance frequency was higher at the higher magnitude (1.0 ms-2 r.m.s.) and lower at the lower magnitude (0.25 ms-2 r.m.s.) than during continuous vibration at the same magnitudes. The response was typical of thixotropy being the primary cause of the nonlinearity. Harmonic distortions in the dynamic force of semi-supine subjects exposed to sinusoidal excitation showed similar dependence on the frequency and magnitude of vibration as previously reported for seated subjects, again suggesting thixotropy as a primary cause of the nonlinearity. In a group of 12 subjects, the apparent mass and transmissibility to the sternum, upper abdomen, and lower abdomen were measured in three supine postures (relaxed semi-supine, lying flat, and constrained semi-supine) during vertical random vibration (0.25 to 20 Hz) at seven vibration magnitudes (nominally 0.0313, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 ms-2 r.m.s.). The motion transmission path that included more soft tissues exhibited a greater nonlinear response. The substantial nonlinearities found in transmissibilities to both the sternum and the abdomen of supine subjects, and previously reported for the transmissibilities of seated and standing subjects, imply that soft tissues at the excitation-subject interface contribute to the nonlinearity. It is concluded that the thixotropy of soft tissues, rather than voluntary or involuntary muscular activity, is the primary cause of the biodynamic nonlinearity seen with varying magnitudes of excitation.

Text
P2487.pdf - Other
Download (13MB)

More information

Published date: May 2008
Organisations: University of Southampton, Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 64575
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/64575
PURE UUID: 0b3fe9eb-026a-4259-8616-31900c069f0a
ORCID for Michael Griffin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-9502

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jan 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2019 01:56

Export record

Contributors

Author: Ya Huang
Thesis advisor: Michael Griffin ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×