The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The derivation of anaphoric relations

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

This thesis develops an analysis of the binding theory within the Minimalist approach to the architecture of the language faculty. As an expression of the principles governing the distribution and referential dependencies of reflexives, pronouns, and referential expressions, the binding theory has proved a highly successful and influential outcome of the generative programme. However, given the central Minimalist conjecture that the computational system is strictly derivational (non-representational), the binding theory has become one of the most problematic modules of the grammar, relying crucially on
syntactically active constraints defined over representations of sentences.

I aim to capture a range of crosslinguistic empirical facts previously attributed to Conditions A and B of the binding theory, armed only with purely derivational concepts and a generalised derivational domain: the ‘phase’. It is argued that binding relations
are essentially determined in the computational component of the grammar, and substantial evidence is provided against viewing the binding conditions as interpretive instructions applying at LF. I argue that the binding conditions’ effects can instead be determined by the core operations Agree and Merge, with previously stipulated constraints on binding, including c-command and locality, falling out naturally from this analysis. Moreover, the strategy of reducing the local binding conditions to more general mechanisms leads to an elimination of the binding theory as a component of Universal Grammar.

Independently motivated modifications to the canonical implementation of the Minimalist model are shown to furnish the approach with sufficient flexibility to account for some long-problematic empirical phenomena. This includes a complete treatment of ‘picture-noun’ reflexivisation in English and an account of the syntactic environments giving rise to non-complementarity between anaphors and pronouns. Finally,
proposals are made for extending the approach to accommodate structured crosslinguistic variation in binding domains and orientation phenomena, with particular focus
on Dutch, Norwegian, and Icelandic pronominal systems.

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

Hicks, Glyn (2006) The derivation of anaphoric relations University of York, Department of Language and Linguistic Science, Doctoral Thesis , 309pp.

More information

Published date: December 2006
Additional Information: A revised version of the thesis has been published by John Benjamins, 2009
Keywords: binding theory, anaphors, minimalism, phases
Organisations: Modern Languages

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 64788
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/64788
PURE UUID: 4061e7a1-5137-436e-9726-e60cd9610b21

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jan 2009
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 14:12

Export record

Contributors

Author: Glyn Hicks
Thesis advisor: Bernadette Plunkett

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×