The quest for a truly parsimonious airfoil parameterisation scheme
The quest for a truly parsimonious airfoil parameterisation scheme
The conceptual phase of the aircraft design process demands a parsimonious description of the airframe geometry. While there is no hard and fast upper limit on the affordable number of variables, the so-called 'curse of dimensionality' must always be kept in mind: if a thorough, conceptual level search of a one-variable space can be accomplished by the evaluation of n candidate designs, the same level of thoroughness (however one chooses to define this) will demand nk evaluations in k-dimensional space. Therefore, to make the design search tractable and the complexity of the geometry definition at a level where the effect of the variables can be readily understood by the designer, the number of airframe definition variables should be minimized. This has an impact on all of the components, perhaps most importantly on airfoil-type section definitions that feature on all 'wing-like' surfaces. It is therefore imperative to define these sections as parsimoniously as possible. In this paper we examine a series of parameterization schemes, whose chief conception criterion was conciseness in terms of the number of design variables. Another constraint we are considering is the ease of implementation in a commercial off-the-shelf Computer Aided Design engine.
24pp
Sóbester, András
096857b0-cad6-45ae-9ae6-e66b8cc5d81b
Barrett, Thomas
aaf7f216-1583-4a24-b087-8ce874d26f67
September 2008
Sóbester, András
096857b0-cad6-45ae-9ae6-e66b8cc5d81b
Barrett, Thomas
aaf7f216-1583-4a24-b087-8ce874d26f67
Sóbester, András and Barrett, Thomas
(2008)
The quest for a truly parsimonious airfoil parameterisation scheme.
ICAS 2008 Congress including the 8th AIAA 2008 ATIO Conference, Anchorage, USA.
14 - 19 Sep 2008.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
The conceptual phase of the aircraft design process demands a parsimonious description of the airframe geometry. While there is no hard and fast upper limit on the affordable number of variables, the so-called 'curse of dimensionality' must always be kept in mind: if a thorough, conceptual level search of a one-variable space can be accomplished by the evaluation of n candidate designs, the same level of thoroughness (however one chooses to define this) will demand nk evaluations in k-dimensional space. Therefore, to make the design search tractable and the complexity of the geometry definition at a level where the effect of the variables can be readily understood by the designer, the number of airframe definition variables should be minimized. This has an impact on all of the components, perhaps most importantly on airfoil-type section definitions that feature on all 'wing-like' surfaces. It is therefore imperative to define these sections as parsimoniously as possible. In this paper we examine a series of parameterization schemes, whose chief conception criterion was conciseness in terms of the number of design variables. Another constraint we are considering is the ease of implementation in a commercial off-the-shelf Computer Aided Design engine.
Text
Sobe_08a.pdf
- Author's Original
More information
Published date: September 2008
Additional Information:
AIAA 2008-8879
Venue - Dates:
ICAS 2008 Congress including the 8th AIAA 2008 ATIO Conference, Anchorage, USA, 2008-09-14 - 2008-09-19
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 64913
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/64913
PURE UUID: 1996cc4f-7701-4753-a16b-1db052ad2bcc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Jan 2009
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:26
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Thomas Barrett
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics