Ultrasound mimics the effect of mechanical loading on bone formation in vivo on rat ulnae
Ultrasound mimics the effect of mechanical loading on bone formation in vivo on rat ulnae
While the effect of ultrasound as an extreme example of low-magnitude high-frequency stimulation has been explored in the response of bone to injury, little is known about its effect on normal bone. This experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that ultrasound exerts a similar influence on bone as mechanical stimulation at a physiological level.
Three groups of female Wistar rats were anaesthetised (6 per group). In one group, the left ulna was loaded cyclically in vivo 40 times, repeated on a further 5 occasions on alternate days. In a second group, transcutaneous low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation was applied to the left ulnae for the same duration as the period of loading. In a third group, loading and ultrasound stimulation were applied concurrently. The right ulna served as non-loaded control in each animal. At the end of the experiment after 14 days, both ulnae were removed. Induced bone formation was assessed by measuring the proportion of medial periosteal bone surface with double label (dLS/BS, %) and by calculation of mineral apposition rate (MAR) from the inter-label distance. All three treatments induced a significant periosteal response, increasing dLS/BS values from <10% in control limbs to >80% in treated limbs. Increases in MAR of experimental ulnae versus contralateral control ulnae were 2.9 (±0.9), 8.6 (±2.4) and 8.7 ?m (±3.2) for the ultrasound only, ultrasound and load, and load only groups, respectively. The effects of loading plus ultrasound were not significantly different from ultrasound alone. These data suggest that ultrasound is able to induce changes in bone that share at least some features with mechanical loading.
42-47
Perry, Mark J.
e1809290-44e7-4aaa-ba48-6e10662c9433
Parry, Laura K.
0680546b-626c-4958-881b-351e6a51dc77
Burton, Victoria J.
54a965a0-7b2a-4116-8bf0-720f331f1ddd
Gheduzzi, Sabina
b03b8ba7-7c1c-4c29-84d0-98fc73cfab67
Beresford, Jon N.
e03bea1d-debb-4e65-a88c-93ce306b821c
Humphrey, Victor
23c9bd0c-7870-428f-b0dd-5ff158d22590
Skerry, Tim M.
0f8820db-3569-4608-a29d-6dbedee08d10
January 2009
Perry, Mark J.
e1809290-44e7-4aaa-ba48-6e10662c9433
Parry, Laura K.
0680546b-626c-4958-881b-351e6a51dc77
Burton, Victoria J.
54a965a0-7b2a-4116-8bf0-720f331f1ddd
Gheduzzi, Sabina
b03b8ba7-7c1c-4c29-84d0-98fc73cfab67
Beresford, Jon N.
e03bea1d-debb-4e65-a88c-93ce306b821c
Humphrey, Victor
23c9bd0c-7870-428f-b0dd-5ff158d22590
Skerry, Tim M.
0f8820db-3569-4608-a29d-6dbedee08d10
Perry, Mark J., Parry, Laura K., Burton, Victoria J., Gheduzzi, Sabina, Beresford, Jon N., Humphrey, Victor and Skerry, Tim M.
(2009)
Ultrasound mimics the effect of mechanical loading on bone formation in vivo on rat ulnae.
Medical Engineering & Physics, 31 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.04.003).
Abstract
While the effect of ultrasound as an extreme example of low-magnitude high-frequency stimulation has been explored in the response of bone to injury, little is known about its effect on normal bone. This experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that ultrasound exerts a similar influence on bone as mechanical stimulation at a physiological level.
Three groups of female Wistar rats were anaesthetised (6 per group). In one group, the left ulna was loaded cyclically in vivo 40 times, repeated on a further 5 occasions on alternate days. In a second group, transcutaneous low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation was applied to the left ulnae for the same duration as the period of loading. In a third group, loading and ultrasound stimulation were applied concurrently. The right ulna served as non-loaded control in each animal. At the end of the experiment after 14 days, both ulnae were removed. Induced bone formation was assessed by measuring the proportion of medial periosteal bone surface with double label (dLS/BS, %) and by calculation of mineral apposition rate (MAR) from the inter-label distance. All three treatments induced a significant periosteal response, increasing dLS/BS values from <10% in control limbs to >80% in treated limbs. Increases in MAR of experimental ulnae versus contralateral control ulnae were 2.9 (±0.9), 8.6 (±2.4) and 8.7 ?m (±3.2) for the ultrasound only, ultrasound and load, and load only groups, respectively. The effects of loading plus ultrasound were not significantly different from ultrasound alone. These data suggest that ultrasound is able to induce changes in bone that share at least some features with mechanical loading.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 2009
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 65318
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/65318
ISSN: 1350-4533
PURE UUID: 6f3d92d4-3d01-463e-b216-f901e2c29bef
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Feb 2009
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:34
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Mark J. Perry
Author:
Laura K. Parry
Author:
Victoria J. Burton
Author:
Sabina Gheduzzi
Author:
Jon N. Beresford
Author:
Tim M. Skerry
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics