The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Disease prevalence in the English population: a comparison of primary care registers and prevalence models

Disease prevalence in the English population: a comparison of primary care registers and prevalence models
Disease prevalence in the English population: a comparison of primary care registers and prevalence models
The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) is a UK system for monitoring general practitioner (GP) activity and performance, introduced in 2004. The objective of this paper is to explore the potential of QOF datasets as a basis for better understanding geographical variations in disease prevalence in England.
In an ecological study, prevalence estimates for four common disease domains (coronary heart disease (CHD), asthma, hypertension and diabetes) were derived from the 2004–2005 QOF primary care disease registers for 354 English Local Authority Districts (LADs). These were compared with synthetic estimates from four prevalence models and with self-reported measures of general health from the 2001 census. Prevalence models were recalculated for LADs using demographic and deprivation data from the census. Results were mapped spatially and cross-tabulated against a national classification of local authorities.
The four disease domains display different spatial distributions and different spatial relationships with the corresponding prevalence model. For example, the prevalence model for CHD under-estimated QOF cases in northern England, but this north-south pattern was not evident for the other disease domains. The census-derived health measures were strongly correlated with CHD, but not with the other disease domains.
The relationship between modelled prevalence and QOF disease registers differs by disease domain, implying that there is no simple cross-domain effect of the QOF process on prevalence figures. Given reliable synthetic estimates of small area prevalence for the QOF disease domains, one potential application of the QOF dataset may be in assessing the geographical extent of under-diagnosis for each domain.
england, morbidity, prevalence, quality and outcomes framework, limiting long-term illness, uk
0277-9536
266-274
Martin, David
e5c52473-e9f0-4f09-b64c-fa32194b162f
Wright, James A.
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Martin, David
e5c52473-e9f0-4f09-b64c-fa32194b162f
Wright, James A.
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464

Martin, David and Wright, James A. (2009) Disease prevalence in the English population: a comparison of primary care registers and prevalence models. Social Science & Medicine, 68 (2), 266-274. (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.021).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) is a UK system for monitoring general practitioner (GP) activity and performance, introduced in 2004. The objective of this paper is to explore the potential of QOF datasets as a basis for better understanding geographical variations in disease prevalence in England.
In an ecological study, prevalence estimates for four common disease domains (coronary heart disease (CHD), asthma, hypertension and diabetes) were derived from the 2004–2005 QOF primary care disease registers for 354 English Local Authority Districts (LADs). These were compared with synthetic estimates from four prevalence models and with self-reported measures of general health from the 2001 census. Prevalence models were recalculated for LADs using demographic and deprivation data from the census. Results were mapped spatially and cross-tabulated against a national classification of local authorities.
The four disease domains display different spatial distributions and different spatial relationships with the corresponding prevalence model. For example, the prevalence model for CHD under-estimated QOF cases in northern England, but this north-south pattern was not evident for the other disease domains. The census-derived health measures were strongly correlated with CHD, but not with the other disease domains.
The relationship between modelled prevalence and QOF disease registers differs by disease domain, implying that there is no simple cross-domain effect of the QOF process on prevalence figures. Given reliable synthetic estimates of small area prevalence for the QOF disease domains, one potential application of the QOF dataset may be in assessing the geographical extent of under-diagnosis for each domain.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2009
Keywords: england, morbidity, prevalence, quality and outcomes framework, limiting long-term illness, uk
Organisations: Geography & Environment, PHEW – S (Spatial analysis and modelling), Population, Health & Wellbeing (PHeW), Remote Sensing & Spatial Analysis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 65400
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/65400
ISSN: 0277-9536
PURE UUID: 2d0b74da-b823-4f1e-8aba-10990d34d5ca
ORCID for David Martin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0397-0769
ORCID for James A. Wright: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8842-2181

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Feb 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×