The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Gender and poverty. How misleading is the unitary model of household resources? An illustration from Tajikistan

Gender and poverty. How misleading is the unitary model of household resources? An illustration from Tajikistan
Gender and poverty. How misleading is the unitary model of household resources? An illustration from Tajikistan
Since December 1999 all countries wishing to access concessional lending from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank are required to prepare a Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP). The vast majority of PRSP incorporate an analysis of the current level and profile of poverty that relies on the unitary model of the household. This article argues that by doing so, policy analysts may receive a distorted view of the relationship between gender and poverty. Using the 2003 Tajikistan Living Standard Survey the article shows how, by modifying the assumption of equal sharing of household resources, gender differentials in the experience of poverty may vary. The article also illustrates how those gender analyses that simply use a dichotomy based on the gender of the head of household may also be misleading. The findings have implications for mainstreaming gender into the PRSP process, and for the priority of policy and programme interventions supported under national Poverty Reduction Strategie.
gender, intra-household allocation, poverty
1468-0181
43-62
Falkingham, Jane
8df36615-1547-4a6d-ad55-aa9496e85519
Baschieri, Angela
8512fd8e-0c0a-4741-acb6-5d05bee0b108
Falkingham, Jane
8df36615-1547-4a6d-ad55-aa9496e85519
Baschieri, Angela
8512fd8e-0c0a-4741-acb6-5d05bee0b108

Falkingham, Jane and Baschieri, Angela (2009) Gender and poverty. How misleading is the unitary model of household resources? An illustration from Tajikistan. Global Social Policy, 9 (1), 43-62. (doi:10.1177/1468018108100397).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Since December 1999 all countries wishing to access concessional lending from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank are required to prepare a Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP). The vast majority of PRSP incorporate an analysis of the current level and profile of poverty that relies on the unitary model of the household. This article argues that by doing so, policy analysts may receive a distorted view of the relationship between gender and poverty. Using the 2003 Tajikistan Living Standard Survey the article shows how, by modifying the assumption of equal sharing of household resources, gender differentials in the experience of poverty may vary. The article also illustrates how those gender analyses that simply use a dichotomy based on the gender of the head of household may also be misleading. The findings have implications for mainstreaming gender into the PRSP process, and for the priority of policy and programme interventions supported under national Poverty Reduction Strategie.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: April 2009
Keywords: gender, intra-household allocation, poverty
Organisations: Social Statistics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 65572
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/65572
ISSN: 1468-0181
PURE UUID: e0c96a8c-87d2-448a-90bb-b137eedd196d
ORCID for Jane Falkingham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7135-5875

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Feb 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jane Falkingham ORCID iD
Author: Angela Baschieri

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×