The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The measure of all things: on the use of time as a value indicator in arts impact assessment

The measure of all things: on the use of time as a value indicator in arts impact assessment
The measure of all things: on the use of time as a value indicator in arts impact assessment
Like money, time is a scarce resource. People used to economizing with one are likely to economize with the other. This proposition has serious implications for cultural economics (as for economics generally); three in particular are explored here. (1) Because cultural values are learned, and learning takes time, from the sorts of learning experience to which people have committed time in the past much can be inferred about their probable cultural consumption behaviour in future and about their attitudes to art. (2) The arts deliver socio-economic impact by encouraging new forms of belief - altering people's values essentially. Beliefs then influence action. Impact assessors must confront the question of value generation head on. (3) Use of time indicators will enable assessors to capture and quantify impacts which barely register on the usual money-economic scale, generating new categories of evidence directly if unconventionally relevant to cultural policy debate. The discussion is situated in historical context, drawing attention to a rich tradition of time-reflexive thinking within professional economics. The assumption underlying much of modern, purposely “neoclassical” cultural economics - that cultural value can best be measured in terms of willingness to pay or willingness to be paid money - is not strictly necessary either in economic theory or in economic practice, and for impact assessment purposes it is not always helpful. Sections following the historical introduction take careful account of recent developments in cultural economics, and to facilitate further reading frequently refer to the summative handbooks edited by Ruth Towse (2003) and Victor Ginsburgh and David Throsby (2006).
time, time economics, cultural value, value indicators, arts impact, h.h. gossen, w .s. Jevons
1469-3690
47-74
Pinnock, Andrew
a13924a7-d53d-41a6-827c-f91013ea4ee0
Pinnock, Andrew
a13924a7-d53d-41a6-827c-f91013ea4ee0

Pinnock, Andrew (2009) The measure of all things: on the use of time as a value indicator in arts impact assessment. Cultural Trends, 18 (1), 47-74. (doi:10.1080/09548960802651229).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Like money, time is a scarce resource. People used to economizing with one are likely to economize with the other. This proposition has serious implications for cultural economics (as for economics generally); three in particular are explored here. (1) Because cultural values are learned, and learning takes time, from the sorts of learning experience to which people have committed time in the past much can be inferred about their probable cultural consumption behaviour in future and about their attitudes to art. (2) The arts deliver socio-economic impact by encouraging new forms of belief - altering people's values essentially. Beliefs then influence action. Impact assessors must confront the question of value generation head on. (3) Use of time indicators will enable assessors to capture and quantify impacts which barely register on the usual money-economic scale, generating new categories of evidence directly if unconventionally relevant to cultural policy debate. The discussion is situated in historical context, drawing attention to a rich tradition of time-reflexive thinking within professional economics. The assumption underlying much of modern, purposely “neoclassical” cultural economics - that cultural value can best be measured in terms of willingness to pay or willingness to be paid money - is not strictly necessary either in economic theory or in economic practice, and for impact assessment purposes it is not always helpful. Sections following the historical introduction take careful account of recent developments in cultural economics, and to facilitate further reading frequently refer to the summative handbooks edited by Ruth Towse (2003) and Victor Ginsburgh and David Throsby (2006).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2009
Keywords: time, time economics, cultural value, value indicators, arts impact, h.h. gossen, w .s. Jevons
Organisations: Music

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 67032
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/67032
ISSN: 1469-3690
PURE UUID: 75626ad1-2168-4cd3-9ac9-e77dd97eef88

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Aug 2009
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 18:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×