The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How equitation science can elucidate and refine horsemanship techniques

Goodwin, Deborah, McGreevy, Paul, Waran, Natalie and Maclean, Andrew (2009) How equitation science can elucidate and refine horsemanship techniques The Veterinary Journal, 181, (1), pp. 5-11. (doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.023).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The long-held belief that human dominance and equine submission are key to successful training and that the horse must be taught to ‘respect’ the trainer infers that force is often used during training. Many horses respond by trialling unwelcome evasions, resistances and flight responses, which readily become established. When unable to cope with problem behaviours, some handlers in the past might have been encouraged to use harsh methods or devices while others may have called in a so-called ‘good horseman’ or ‘horse whisperer’ to remediate the horse. Frequently, the approaches such practitioners offer could not be applied by the horse’s owner or trainer because of their lack of understanding or inability to apply the techniques. Often it seemed that these ‘horse–people’ had magical ways with horses (e.g., they only had to whisper to them) that achieved impressive results although they had little motivation to divulge their techniques.
As we begin to appreciate how to communicate with horses sensitively and consistently, misunderstandings and misinterpretations by horse and trainer should become less common. Recent studies have begun to reveal what comprises the simplest, most humane and most effective mechanisms in horse training and these advances are being matched by greater sharing of knowledge among practitioners. Indeed, various practitioners of what is referred to here as ‘natural horsemanship’ now use techniques similar to the ‘whisperers’ of old, but they are more open about their methods. Reputable horse trainers using natural horsemanship approaches are talented observers of horse behaviour and respond consistently and swiftly to the horse’s subtle cues during training. For example, in the roundpen these trainers apply an aversive stimulus to prompt a flight response and then, when the horse slows down, moves toward them, or offers space-reducing affiliative signals, the trainer immediately modifies his/her agonistic signals, thus negatively reinforcing the desired response.
Learning theory and equine ethology, the fundamentals of the emerging discipline of equitation science, can be used to explain almost all the behaviour modification that goes on in these contexts and in conventional horsemanship. By measuring and evaluating what works and what does not, equitation science has the potential to have a unifying effect on traditional practices and developing branches of equitation.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: July 2009
Keywords: horse, training, equitation, learning theory, ethology, cognition

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 67129
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/67129
ISSN: 1090-0233
PURE UUID: 0c26a378-d967-4d5a-ab69-9d22b8ca7013

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Aug 2009
Last modified: 19 Jul 2017 00:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Deborah Goodwin
Author: Paul McGreevy
Author: Natalie Waran
Author: Andrew Maclean

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×