An evaluation of advanced access in general practice

Salisbury, Chris, Banks, Jon, Goodall, Stephen, Baxter, Helen, Montgomery, Alan, Pope, Catherine, Gerard, Karen, Simons, Lucy, Lattimer, Val, Sampson, Fiona, Pickin, Mark, Edwards, Sarah, Smith, Helen and Boudioni, Markella (2007) An evaluation of advanced access in general practice National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation


Full text not available from this repository.


Aims: To evaluate ‘Advanced Access’ in general practice, and assess its impact on patients, practice organisation, activity, and staff.
Objectives: To describe the range of strategies that general practices have employed to improve access to care To determine the impact of Advanced Access on the wait for an appointment, continuity of care, practice workload, and demand on other NHS services. To explore the perceptions of different groups of patients, including both users and non-users of services, about the accessibility of care and their satisfaction with access to care in relation to different models of organisation. To explore the trade-offs that patients make between speed of access, continuity of care and other factors when making an appointment in general practice. To explore the perceptions of general practitioners and receptionists about working with the NPDT and implementing changes to practice arrangements to improve access. To assess the impact of the above changes in practice organisation on staff job satisfaction and team climate.
Method and results: This research was based on a comparison of 48 general practices, half of which operated Advanced Access appointment systems and half of which did not (designated ‘control’ practices). These practices were recruited from 12 representative Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). From within these 48 practices, eight (four Advanced Access and four control) were selected for in-depth case study using an ethnographic approach. The research was comprised of several component studies. These included: • A survey of all practices in 12 PCTs. Based on this we recruited the 24 Advanced Access and 24 control practices and the 8 case study practices. • An assessment of appointments available and patients seen, based on appointments records • An assessment of continuity of care based on patients’ records • Random phone calls to practices to assess ability to make an appointment by telephone • A questionnaire survey of patients attending the practices • A postal survey of patients who had not attended the surgery in the previous 12 months • A discrete choice experiment to explore trade-offs patients make between access and other factors • A survey of practice staff • Qualitative case studies in 8 practices • Interviews with PCT access facilitators The methods and results for each of these studies are described below, in relation to each of the research objectives.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This report describes a research study into how GP appointments are organised, particularly the use of the 'Advanced Access' method of improving access to appointments. The study compared practices that used 'Advanced Access' with others that did not. The researchers assessed the impact on patients, practices and practice staff.
Related URLs:
ePrint ID: 67203
Date :
Date Event
15 February 2007Published
Date Deposited: 10 Aug 2009
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 21:27
Further Information:Google Scholar

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item