The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

From regimes to revolutions: technology and technique at the bronze age tell at Szazhalombatta, Hungary

From regimes to revolutions: technology and technique at the bronze age tell at Szazhalombatta, Hungary
From regimes to revolutions: technology and technique at the bronze age tell at Szazhalombatta, Hungary
INTRODUCTION: ON REVOLUTIONS AND REGIMES The notion of “revolution” in archaeology is typically understood in terms of major social transformations underpinned by technological changes. This idea owes a particular debt to Vere Gordon Childe, who created large-scale narratives using the notion of revolution to explore shifts from one level of material and social development to another in dramatic terms. Thus Childe famously identified a Neolithic Revolution and an Urban Revolution, both of which he saw as periods of sudden upheaval and social rearrangement (Childe 1936). To Childe, there was a clear correlation between social organization and economic development (Childe 1944, 1951). This view of social change accorded technology an external role as part of the means and forces of production, which Childe saw as fundamental to understanding the formation of prehistoric Europe. In other words, social organization was not assigned any internal dynamics but presented as dependent on outside forces, with technology having a determining role as the arbiter of social change (Sofaer and Sørensen in press). The move over recent decades toward an emphasis on the internal dynamics of societies, including discussions of agency and social power, has implicitly rejected this view. However, this reaction has, in the main, consisted of a shift in thematic interest rather than a critical reexamination of the relationship between technology and society (Sofaer and Sørensen in press). Thus, although the Childean view of prehistory has in general been rejected, many of Childe’s underlying assumptions regarding the relationship between society and technology remain influential (Sofaer and Sørensen in press).
9781107016521
Cambridge University Press
Sofaer, Joanna
038f9eb2-5863-46ef-8eaf-fb2513b75ee2
Hartley, C
Yazicioglu, B
Smith, A
Sofaer, Joanna
038f9eb2-5863-46ef-8eaf-fb2513b75ee2
Hartley, C
Yazicioglu, B
Smith, A

Sofaer, Joanna (2012) From regimes to revolutions: technology and technique at the bronze age tell at Szazhalombatta, Hungary. In, Hartley, C, Yazicioglu, B and Smith, A (eds.) Regimes and Revolutions: The Archaeology of Power and Politics in Eurasia. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: ON REVOLUTIONS AND REGIMES The notion of “revolution” in archaeology is typically understood in terms of major social transformations underpinned by technological changes. This idea owes a particular debt to Vere Gordon Childe, who created large-scale narratives using the notion of revolution to explore shifts from one level of material and social development to another in dramatic terms. Thus Childe famously identified a Neolithic Revolution and an Urban Revolution, both of which he saw as periods of sudden upheaval and social rearrangement (Childe 1936). To Childe, there was a clear correlation between social organization and economic development (Childe 1944, 1951). This view of social change accorded technology an external role as part of the means and forces of production, which Childe saw as fundamental to understanding the formation of prehistoric Europe. In other words, social organization was not assigned any internal dynamics but presented as dependent on outside forces, with technology having a determining role as the arbiter of social change (Sofaer and Sørensen in press). The move over recent decades toward an emphasis on the internal dynamics of societies, including discussions of agency and social power, has implicitly rejected this view. However, this reaction has, in the main, consisted of a shift in thematic interest rather than a critical reexamination of the relationship between technology and society (Sofaer and Sørensen in press). Thus, although the Childean view of prehistory has in general been rejected, many of Childe’s underlying assumptions regarding the relationship between society and technology remain influential (Sofaer and Sørensen in press).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2012

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 68781
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/68781
ISBN: 9781107016521
PURE UUID: 4be18ee8-2bde-4b68-8d80-03bce6021ce2
ORCID for Joanna Sofaer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-8636

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Oct 2009
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:47

Export record

Contributors

Author: Joanna Sofaer ORCID iD
Editor: C Hartley
Editor: B Yazicioglu
Editor: A Smith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×